Bounding Box vs. Rectangle

Question

What is the difference between a Bounding Box and a Rectangle?

This question is specifically about Unity 3D's Bounds and Rect classes, but I am moreso interested in a general answer.

Specifically:

• Which is better on performance?
• Is a Bounding Box just a 3D Rectangle?
• When should I prefer one over the other?
• Are they interchangeable terms, and if so, why does Unity 3D have separate classes for them?
• Any other knowledge you can bestow would be greatly appreciated!

Answer 1

Which is better on performance?

Irrelevant. They are the same in 2D, and in 3D they have different meaning/use.

Is a Bounding Box just a 3D Rectangle?

There is no such thing as a 3D rectangle. You mean a box. A bounding box is a box that's just large enough to encompass all collidable parts of an entity/model.

When should I prefer one over the other?

Irrelevant, see first paragraph.

Are they interchangeable terms, and if so, why does Unity 3D have separate classes for them?

Again, 2D vs 3D.

Any other knowledge you can bestow would be greatly appreciated!

Bounding boxes exist to improve performance of collision detection. If two body's bounding boxes do not intersect, there is no need to further process any of their colliders or in 2D performing a pixel-perfect intersection test. Bounding boxes allow the collision detection algorithm to quickly discard any guaranteed non-colliding bodies.

Answer 2

The basic difference is 2d vs 3d.

You cannot define the boundary of a 3d object with a 2d rectangle.

In theory you could use a Bounds instead of a Recto (by setting one axis to 0), but not a Rect instead of a Bounds. There would be a small perf loss since Bounds require more data.

Abbot's Flatland is a classic overview of interactions between 2d and 3d space