I know gh cli creates a local and remote repo with gh repo create
.
But I created and worked on my local repo with git init and so on.
Then I want to create a remote repo and add that remote repo to my local one just to push it.
So if I use gh repo create
, it tries to create a local <> repo inside the one im working on. If I say dont do that, it discard all the process, so no remote repo created.
I just want to create a remote named repo and then add that to my local one whitout complicated scripts or without leaving cli.
I feel gh repo create
miss a step when you don't want to create a local repo but a remote one, so discard is the last extra step. Is all of this right?
I read the gh cli docs but didn't find answers to my needs.
I missunderstood the docs as the CLI promts with this line:
This will create '<remote-name>' in your current directory. Continue?
So I thought this creates an new local repo inside your repo with the name of the remote one.
This is wrong as the docs says this:
Solved.