I am developing an app that allows people to publish content to my site and then pushed to their blog. I don't want to get hit by Google or the other search engines for duplicate content, so what can I do to avoid being penalized? Thanks.
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SEO
- Rails HABTM: Select everything a that a record 'has'
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- dynamically create an ical / ics file from a rails model
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- NoMethodError: undefined method `update_average_rating' for nil:NilClass
- Select results where joined table contains records with an attribute, but without another
- Showing posts only created when boolean was true
- Ruby on rails and HAML - Print a hash with background color
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- How to create dynamic pages without form_for helper in Rails?
Related Questions in DUPLICATE-DATA
- Rails HABTM: Select everything a that a record 'has'
- Best way to make an HABTM association via console
- dynamically create an ical / ics file from a rails model
- Ruby destroy is not working? Or objects still present?
- NoMethodError: undefined method `update_average_rating' for nil:NilClass
- Select results where joined table contains records with an attribute, but without another
- Showing posts only created when boolean was true
- Ruby on rails and HAML - Print a hash with background color
- How can I monitor an endpoint's status with Ruby?
- How to create dynamic pages without form_for helper in Rails?
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
You need to figure out which site (yours or theirs) that should be treated as the canonical source of the content. Depending on your decision/answer, the following would apply:
Your site canonical:
- reference the URL with the
rel="canonical"link element.- delay the push to their blog by 24 hours
- update the URL in your XML sitemap with a time-stamp
- make all of the HREF values of any links in the article as absolute (with your domain)
Their site canonical:
- reference their site with a rel=canonical element in your head
- push instantly to their blog
- don't include any reference the article in your XML sitemap
- consider using
"noindex, follow"in your meta- make all of the HREF values of any links in the article as relative
Then it comes down to what control you can exert on their site - but ultimately it's up to them.