I am in the process of writing a library that does monitoring/OpenTracing and I am attempting to use sbt-aspectj so that users of the library don't need to manually instrument their code. I am currently however getting an issue with creating an sbt-project representing such a library.
The idea is that I want an external library as indicated in this sample here https://github.com/sbt/sbt-aspectj/tree/master/src/sbt-test/weave/external however that external library is dependant on an external dependency (i.e. akka-actors
). Basically I am trying to combine both https://github.com/sbt/sbt-aspectj/tree/master/src/sbt-test/weave/external and https://github.com/sbt/sbt-aspectj/tree/master/src/sbt-test/weave/jar. I have created a sample project here https://github.com/mdedetrich/sbt-aspectj-issue to indicate the problem I am having however below is the relevant sample
lazy val root = (project in file("."))
.enablePlugins(SbtAspectj)
.settings(
name := RootName,
version := Version,
// add akka-actor as an aspectj input (find it in the update report)
// aspectjInputs in Aspectj ++= update.value.matching(
// moduleFilter(organization = "com.typesafe.akka", name = "akka-actor*")),
// replace the original akka-actor jar with the instrumented classes in runtime
// fullClasspath in Runtime := aspectjUseInstrumentedClasses(Runtime).value,
// only compile the aspects (no weaving)
aspectjCompileOnly in Aspectj := true,
// ignore warnings (we don't have the target classes at this point)
aspectjLintProperties in Aspectj += "invalidAbsoluteTypeName = ignore",
// replace regular products with compiled aspects
products in Compile ++= (products in Aspectj).value,
libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-actor" % akkaVersion
)
)
lazy val test = (project in file("test"))
.enablePlugins(SbtAspectj)
.settings(
aspectjBinaries in Aspectj ++= update.value.matching(
moduleFilter(organization = Organization, name = s"$RootName*")),
aspectjInputs in Aspectj ++= update.value.matching(
moduleFilter(organization = "com.typesafe.akka", name = "akka-actor*")),
fullClasspath in Runtime := aspectjUseInstrumentedClasses(Runtime).value,
// weave this project's classes
aspectjInputs in Aspectj += (aspectjCompiledClasses in Aspectj).value,
products in Compile := (products in Aspectj).value,
products in Runtime := (products in Compile).value,
libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
Organization %% RootName % Version
)
)
The idea is that we publish the root
project using root/publishLocal
and the test project is just designed to include root
as a libraryDependency
so we can see if the aspect-j is working properly.
The problem is simple that I am unable to get it working. The current code at https://github.com/mdedetrich/sbt-aspectj-issue publishes with root/publishLocal
(not sure if its correct though) however when I then do test/run
I get this
[info] Weaving 2 inputs with 1 AspectJ binary to /home/mdedetrich/github/sbt-aspectj-issue/test/target/scala-2.13/aspectj/classes...
[error] stack trace is suppressed; run last test / Compile / packageBin for the full output
[error] (test / Compile / packageBin) java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
[error] Total time: 1 s, completed Dec 29, 2019 4:31:27 PM
sbt:sbt-aspectj-issue>
Which seems to be an issue with having duplicate akka-actor
entries. I tried toggling various entries in build.sbt
but didn't manage to get it working.
EDIT: This was also posted as a github issue here https://github.com/sbt/sbt-aspectj/issues/44
Generally, you can exclude the
META-INF
directories from the external libraries woven.But for akka libraries, there is another problem. In each akka library, there is a
reference.conf
, which contains the fallback configuration for the provided features. This will also lead to conflicts like theMETA-INF
did. But it cannot be just excluded like theMETA-INF
, because they are essential for akka to work properly.If you exclude them, you'll have to provide all the required akka configurations in your
application.conf
, or a merged (not simply concatenate)reference.conf
in your project. It's not trivial, and subject to version change of akka.Another solution would be weaving and repackaging the akka libraries individually, so the
reference.conf
can be kept in the repackaged libraries. The project layout and build script will a bit more complicated, but also be easier to maintain if you have plan to upgrade to newer versions of akka in the future.