I'm designing a system using Domain-Driven design principals.
I have an aggregate named Album
.
It contains a collection of Track
s.
Album
instances are created using a factory method named create(props)
.
Rule 1: An Album
must contain at least one Track
.
This rule must be checked upon creation (in Album.create(props)
).
Also, there must a method named addTrack(track: Track)
so that a new Track
can be added after the instance is created. That means addTrack(track: Track)
must check the rule too.
How can I avoid this logic code duplication?
DDD - Invariant enforcement using instance methods and a factory method
135 Views Asked by Amirhosein Al At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OOP
- Sort oberservableArray by multiple parameters
- change max-height by clicking collapse button
- J-Query Context Menu updating via Knockout call
- which function will be consider as view model in knockout js
- Change CSS of element in after Move event of Knockout sortable
- How to call a nested function from out side knockout js
- KO binding is not working in IE10 and IE11
- Mapping not working with api call
- Issue with Syncfusion ejGrid and knockout.js when displaying summary rows
- Using Knockoutjs Mapping Plugin inside viewmodel constructor
Related Questions in DESIGN-PATTERNS
- Sort oberservableArray by multiple parameters
- change max-height by clicking collapse button
- J-Query Context Menu updating via Knockout call
- which function will be consider as view model in knockout js
- Change CSS of element in after Move event of Knockout sortable
- How to call a nested function from out side knockout js
- KO binding is not working in IE10 and IE11
- Mapping not working with api call
- Issue with Syncfusion ejGrid and knockout.js when displaying summary rows
- Using Knockoutjs Mapping Plugin inside viewmodel constructor
Related Questions in DOMAIN-DRIVEN-DESIGN
- Sort oberservableArray by multiple parameters
- change max-height by clicking collapse button
- J-Query Context Menu updating via Knockout call
- which function will be consider as view model in knockout js
- Change CSS of element in after Move event of Knockout sortable
- How to call a nested function from out side knockout js
- KO binding is not working in IE10 and IE11
- Mapping not working with api call
- Issue with Syncfusion ejGrid and knockout.js when displaying summary rows
- Using Knockoutjs Mapping Plugin inside viewmodel constructor
Related Questions in FACTORY-PATTERN
- Sort oberservableArray by multiple parameters
- change max-height by clicking collapse button
- J-Query Context Menu updating via Knockout call
- which function will be consider as view model in knockout js
- Change CSS of element in after Move event of Knockout sortable
- How to call a nested function from out side knockout js
- KO binding is not working in IE10 and IE11
- Mapping not working with api call
- Issue with Syncfusion ejGrid and knockout.js when displaying summary rows
- Using Knockoutjs Mapping Plugin inside viewmodel constructor
Related Questions in AGGREGATEROOT
- Sort oberservableArray by multiple parameters
- change max-height by clicking collapse button
- J-Query Context Menu updating via Knockout call
- which function will be consider as view model in knockout js
- Change CSS of element in after Move event of Knockout sortable
- How to call a nested function from out side knockout js
- KO binding is not working in IE10 and IE11
- Mapping not working with api call
- Issue with Syncfusion ejGrid and knockout.js when displaying summary rows
- Using Knockoutjs Mapping Plugin inside viewmodel constructor
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Well, if
Album
makes sure it has at least oneTrack
upon instantiation I don't see whyaddTrack
would be concerned that rule could ever be violated? Did you perhaps meanremoveTrack
?In that case you could go for something as simple as the following:
Please note that you could also have mutated the state first and checked the rule after which makes things simpler at first glance, but it's usually a bad practice because the model could be left in an invalid state if the exception is handled, unless the model reverts the change, but that gets even more complex.
Also note that if
Track
is an entity, it's probably a better idea not to let the client code create theTrack
to preserve encapsulation, but rather pass aTrackInfo
value object or something similar.