if there are experts users of both plug-ins, could someone please elaborate on the differences in the functionalities? Are there design tasks which can be solved/performed with the one but not with the other? I am not an expert user of any of them, and have worked only with Dynamo so far. I am aware that both are algorithmic modelling tools, but also that much more than geometrical data can be accessed and modelled (with Dynamo this is definitely the case). So I was wondering: are there areas/tasks which can be covered and solved with the one but not with the other, and are there some significant differences in the scope and depth of the tasks which can be achieved with the one but not with the other?
Differences between Dynamo for Revit and Grasshoper for Rhino
427 Views Asked by Savoya At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REVIT-API
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Related Questions in GRASSHOPPER
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
I would say the main difference lies in the parent application they are running in, and it's general scope as modelling programs.
Grasshopper is very good at creating, modifying and processing geometry. But is not that good at managing "meta-data" and other non-geometric concepts.
Dynamo on the other hand, which mainly runs in BIM software (Revit, Civil...) is heavily influenced by this; it's very good at managing nested data structures like Dictionaries and other non-geometric types, but when it comes to geometry it lacks the advanced tools that Grasshopper provides.
Granted, there is a great community of 3rd party developers that do great stuff for both platforms, and will allow you to overcome most of the limitations of either, but my personal opinion would be that with the addition of Rhino.Inside, Grasshopper is the way to go.