I currently use Imagick library on PHP and use the resizing functionality of Image Magick. I've just learned about decompression bombs and how ImageMagick is vulnerable to it.
I have checked how we can ping the image and verify the dimensions of the image without actually loading it into memory/disk. It's also safer to limit the memory and disk limits of ImageMagick so it wouldn't just write a huge file on disk.
I've read and I can do that with setResourceLimit(). http://php.net/manual/en/imagick.setresourcelimit.php
IMagick::setResourceLimit(IMagick::RESOURCETYPE_MEMORY , 100);
IMagick::setResourceLimit(IMagick::RESOURCETYPE_DISK , 100);
$thumb = new Imagick('image.png');
$thumb->resizeImage(320,240,Imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS,1);
However, what happens is that after setting the limit of disk and memory, if an image does hit this limit, all I get is a segmentation fault error, no exceptions are thrown. This makes it impossible for me to handle it properly.
Update:
Here are the package versions I'm using:
dpkg -l | grep magick
ii imagemagick-common 8:6.6.9.7-5ubuntu3.3 image manipulation programs -- infrastructure
ii libmagickcore4 8:6.6.9.7-5ubuntu3.3 low-level image manipulation library
ii libmagickwand4 8:6.6.9.7-5ubuntu3.3 image manipulation library
ii php5-imagick 3.1.0~rc1-1 ImageMagick module for php5
Setting the 'Resource Area' limit only sets the size at which images are not held in memory, and instead are paged to disk. If you want to use that setting to actually restrict the maximum size image that can be openend, you also need to set the 'Resource Disk' limit.
The code below correctly gives a memory allocation error for the image bombs taken from here.
Output is:
If you want to set the width and height resource, and have a version of ImageMagick >= 6.9.0-1 you should be able to using the values directly of WidthResource = 9, HeightResource = 10
These don't have to be set programmatically, you can set them through the policy.xml file installed with ImageMagick. ImageMagick reads that file and uses those settings if none are set in a program - which may be a more convenient way of setting them, as you can change them per machine.
It makes it impossible for you to handle it in the same process. You can handle it just fine by running the image processing in a background task.
Personally I think anyway that uses Imagick in a server that is accessed directly by web-browsers is nuts. It is far safer to run it in as a background task (managed by something like http://supervisord.org/) and communicating with that background task via a queue of jobs that need to be processed.
Not only does that solve the 'bad images can bring down my website' problem, it also makes it far easier to monitor resource usage, or shift the image processing to a machine with a faster CPU than a web-front end server needs.
Source - I'm the maintainer of the Imagick extension and I recently added this to the Imagick readme: