Improvement needed in RDF format

Question

I am able to generate an RDF but the format is not proper because of which i m not able to fire proper Sparql QUERY ..I need to improve the format of the RDF.I want to have classes, instance ,property to be there in RDF for Objecttype,Attribbutetype,Relationtype..can u guys help me out in deriving that RDF ..code snnipet would be of great help...

i m pasting the rdf that i m able to generate.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:ns1="http://example.com/nodetypes/2012/04/24/vehicle/"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 >
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/nodetypes/2012/04/24/vehicle/2">
    <ns1:nodetype_ptr_id>2</ns1:nodetype_ptr_id>
    <ns1:slug>vehicle</ns1:slug>
    <ns1:last_update>2012-04-24 23:49:36.633689</ns1:last_update>
    <ns1:end_publication>2042-03-15 00:00:00</ns1:end_publication>
    <ns1:tree_id>2</ns1:tree_id>
    <ns1:featured>False</ns1:featured>
    <ns1:parent_id>None</ns1:parent_id>
    <ns1:content></ns1:content>
    <ns1:rating_score>0</ns1:rating_score>
    <ns1:rating_votes>0</ns1:rating_votes>
    <ns1:start_publication>2012-04-24 23:49:15</ns1:start_publication>
    <ns1:level>0</ns1:level>
    <ns1:creation_date>2012-04-24 23:49:15</ns1:creation_date>
    <ns1:nodemodel>Objecttype</ns1:nodemodel>
    <ns1:status>2</ns1:status>
    <ns1:template>gstudio/nodetype_detail.html</ns1:template>
    <ns1:content_org>None</ns1:content_org>
    <ns1:excerpt></ns1:excerpt>
    <ns1:plural>vehicles</ns1:plural>
    <ns1:comment_enabled>True</ns1:comment_enabled>
    <ns1:password></ns1:password>
    <ns1:title>vehicle</ns1:title>
    <ns1:login_required>False</ns1:login_required>
    <ns1:pingback_enabled>True</ns1:pingback_enabled>
    <ns1:rurl></ns1:rurl>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

in the code there is an rdf description of

 <ns1:nodemodel>Objecttype</ns1:nodemodel>.

since it is an objecttype it should be placed under rdf:class.I am a new bee in this field and i don't have much knowledge about RDF..so any kind of help would be really really helpful.

Answer 1

The presence of those things shouldn't affect your ability to do SPARQL queries.

Besides, that kind of information is normally in your OWL ontology rather than the RDF. The pretty formatting you can put into the RDF is just that ... formatting ... not informational. It disappears when you ingest the RDF into a triple store.