While reading RFC 1035 Section 5.1 in order to write a master file parser, I stumbled across the following statement:
5.1. Format
The format of these files is a sequence of entries. Entries are predominantly line-oriented, though parentheses can be used to continue a list of items across a line boundary, and text literals can contain CRLF within the text. Any combination of tabs and spaces act as a delimiter between the separate items that make up an entry. The end of any line in the master file can end with a comment. The comment starts with a ";" (semicolon).
What do the authors mean by "text literals can contain CRLF within the text"? I am aware that the beneath entry is valid as outlined in Section 5.3 but I fail to find either an example of the statement or a proper definition of "text literal". I have furthermore searched the companion RFC 1034 without success for any mention of the above statement.
@ IN SOA VENERA Action\.domains (
20 ; SERIAL
7200 ; REFRESH
600 ; RETRY
3600000; EXPIRE
60) ; MINIMUM
I would assume a text literal could be delimited by parentheses. Would any of the following comments be valid per RFC 1035 and in what different ways would a CRLF be valid in the file?
@ IN SOA VENERA Action\.domains (
20 ; Some example of a multi-line comment
inside parentheses
7200
600
3600000
60) ; (Some example of parentheses
inside a multi-line comment)
It means that this is supposed to be valid:
The RFC authors probably expect it to be equivalent to:
Due to the ambiguity of line ending encodings in this situations (if the platform uses LF as the line terminator, do you still get CRLF in the TXT record?), I doubt this is widely implemented.