Is there any sense in having both permissions ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION and ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION

298 Views Asked by At

As I understand from here when you have ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION (GPS, cell towers, and Wi-Fi) then having ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION (cell towers, and Wi-Fi) in pointless as it's subset of ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION.

However when I look on permissions for popular geofencing apps (Life360, Family Locator) they have both ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION and ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION defined.

Do I miss something?

EDIT: And I've found this in here:

Requesting ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION implies a request for ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION.

0

There are 0 best solutions below