String x = (String) null;
Why there is no exception in this statement?
String x = null;
System.out.println(x);
It prints null. But .toString() method should throw a null pointer exception.
String x = (String) null;
Why there is no exception in this statement?
String x = null;
System.out.println(x);
It prints null. But .toString() method should throw a null pointer exception.
On
Println(Object) uses String.valueOf()
public static String valueOf(Object obj) {
return (obj == null) ? "null" : obj.toString();
}
Print(String) does null check.
public void print(String s) {
if (s == null) {
s = "null";
}
write(s);
}
On
This is by design. You can cast null to any reference type. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to assign it to reference variables.
On
You can cast null to any reference type. You can also call methods which handle a null as an argument, e.g. System.out.println(Object) does, but you cannot reference a null value and call a method on it.
BTW There is a tricky situation where it appears you can call static methods on null values.
Thread t = null;
t.yield(); // Calls static method Thread.yield() so this runs fine.
On
Casting null values is required for following construct where a method is overloaded and if null is passed to these overloaded methods then the compiler does not know how to clear up the ambiguity hence we need to typecast null in these cases:
class A {
public void foo(Long l) {
// do something with l
}
public void foo(String s) {
// do something with s
}
}
new A().foo((String)null);
new A().foo((Long)null);
Otherwise you couldn't call the method you need.
On
This is very handy when using a method that would otherwise be ambiguous. For example: JDialog has constructors with the following signatures:
JDialog(Frame, String, boolean, GraphicsConfiguration)
JDialog(Dialog, String, boolean, GraphicsConfiguration)
I need to use this constructor, because I want to set the GraphicsConfiguration, but I have no parent for this dialog, so the first argument should be null. Using
JDialog(null, String, boolean, Graphicsconfiguration)
is ambiguous, so in this case I can narrow the call by casting null to one of the supported types:
JDialog((Frame) null, String, boolean, GraphicsConfiguration)
On
As others have written, you can cast null to everything. Normally, you wouldn't need that, you can write:
String nullString = null;
without putting the cast there.
But there are occasions where such casts make sense:
a) if you want to make sure that a specific method is called, like:
void foo(String bar) { ... }
void foo(Object bar) { ... }
then it would make a difference if you type
foo((String) null) vs. foo(null)
b) if you intend to use your IDE to generate code; for example I am typically writing unit tests like:
@Test(expected=NullPointerException.class)
public testCtorWithNullWhatever() {
new MyClassUnderTest((Whatever) null);
}
I am doing TDD; this means that the class "MyClassUnderTest" probably doesn't exist yet. By writing down that code, I can then use my IDE to first generate the new class; and to then generate a constructor accepting a "Whatever" argument "out of the box" - the IDE can figure from my test that the constructor should take exactly one argument of type Whatever.
On
Many answers here already mention
You can cast null to any reference type
and
If the argument is null, then a string equal to "null"
I wondered where that is specified and looked it up the Java Specification:
The null reference can always be assigned or cast to any reference type (§5.2, §5.3, §5.5).
If the reference is null, it is converted to the string "null" (four ASCII characters n, u, l, l).
You can cast
nullto any reference type without getting any exception.The
printlnmethod does not throw null pointer because it first checks whether the object is null or not. If null then it simply prints the string"null". Otherwise it will call thetoStringmethod of that object.Adding more details: Internally print methods call
String.valueOf(object)method on the input object. And invalueOfmethod, this check helps to avoid null pointer exception:For rest of your confusion, calling any method on a null object should throw a null pointer exception, if not a special case.