With a working solution found, I am trying to understand why my solution does not work. I have added the minimal working example (MWE), at first I show the working solution, then I show an attempted solution at 1. and at 2. I am printing all elements of the array manually, and then again in the for loop.
From that I conclude that the outer for loop (with counter i
) is evaluated first and then after that the inner for loop (with counter q
) is evaluated. I am confused and was wondering whether my understanding of the evaluation order of Java's for loops is incorrect, or whether I have a syntax/different error that I am missing.
Question: Could anyone suggest a reason for the order of evaluation of for loops?
public class LearnMultiDimensionalArrayLength {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Generate array
double[][] a = {{1.5, -10.3, 0}, {-2.5, 8, 1.3}};
// call method that loops through the array
forloops(a);
}
public static void forloops(double[][] a) {
// Working solution:
//loops through all elements of the array and prints their values.
for (double[] x : a)
{
for (double y : x)
{
System.out.print(y + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
// Now I tried my own solution:
System.out.println("The first dimension length: "+ a.length +
" The second dim. length: " + a[1].length);
System.out.println("first dim-1 ="+ (a.length -1));
System.out.println("Second dim-1 ="+ (a[1].length -1));
// Question to self: Why is the following for loop wrong?
// for (int i=0;i <= a.length;i++){
// for (int q=0;q <= a[1].length;i++){
// System.out.println("["+i+"]"+"["+q+"]"+"="+a[i][q]);
// }
// }
// 1. Attempted Answer: Because the lengths are the nr of rows
// and nr of columns in the matrix. so with n = 2, there are only the elements
// 0 and 1 in the first []
// Test hypotheses by looping through the array a with length-1:
// for (int i=0;i <= a.length-1;i++){
// for (int q=0;q <= a[1].length-1;i++){
// System.out.println("["+i+"]"+"["+q+"]"+"="+a[i][q]);
// }
// }
// Conclusion, that did solve the problem.
// 2. Attempt: Print all elements and their values, then compare
// with what the for loop does:
System.out.println("a[0][0]="+a[0][0]);
System.out.println("a[0][1]="+a[0][1]);
System.out.println("a[0][2]="+a[0][2]);
System.out.println("a[1][0]="+a[1][0]);
System.out.println("a[1][1]="+a[1][1]);
System.out.println("a[1][2]="+a[1][2]);
// System.out.println("a[2][0]="+a[2][0]);
// System.out.println("a[2][1]="+a[2][1]);
// System.out.println("a[2][2]="+a[2][2]);
// 2.a Troubleshooting: verify the upper bound of the for loops
// are not producing an error due to differences in types:
System.out.println(((Object)1).getClass().getName());
System.out.println(((Object)a[1].length).getClass().getName());
System.out.println(((Object)(a[1].length-1)).getClass().getName());
// All expressions are evaluated as integer, both i and q are integers
// hence the different types should not result in a false negative.
// The actual problematic for loop:
System.out.println("Boolean evaluation:" + (1 == (a.length-1)));
for (int i=0; (i <= (a.length-1));i++){
for (int q=0; (q <= (a[1].length-1));i++){
//System.out.println("retry" + "[i="+i+"]"+"[q="+q+"]"+"="+a[i][q]);
System.out.println("This is the wrong order of for loops" + "[q="+q+"]"+"[i="+i+"]"+"="+a[q][i]);
}
}
}
}
Why don't you run this piece of code and try to understand how it works... Once you do, play around (change the values) and see what happens