I am using Ubuntu 16.04.5 and GCC version 5.4.0.
I was playing with sizeof() operator, wrote the code below:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
long int mylint = 31331313131.1313;
printf("size of long int is %d\n", sizeof(mylint));
printf("size of long int is %d\n", sizeof(long int));
return 0;
}
I tried to compile using gcc -o ... ... command and was expecting:
size of long int is 8
size of long int is 8
But I got the following error:
fl_double_lint.c: In function ‘main’:
fl_double_lint.c:11:9: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat=]
printf("size of long int is %d\n", sizeof(mylint));
^
fl_double_lint.c:12:9: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat=]
printf("size of long int is %d\n", sizeof(long int));
When I use %ld instead it works as expected. Why sizeof() is not working with %d? (Why 'long unsigned int' but not 'int'?)
Edit: I know that many questions were asked regarding output of sizeof() operator (as suggested in comments). However, they do not answer the question of why using %d does not work (i.e. does not give any result). I know it is not correct format, but whenever we have a char type variable using %d we can get equivalent int result, this is also the case for short, uint8_t, uint16_t, uint32_t (generally for types with equal or less than 32 bit). The following code works:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
char mychar = 'd';
uint32_t myuint32 = 32;
uint16_t myuint16 = 16;
uint8_t myuint8 = 8;
short myshort = 26945;
int myint = 100;
printf("integer equivalent of mychar is %d\n", mychar);
printf("integer equivalent of myuint8 is %d\n", myuint8);
printf("integer equivalent of myuint16 is %d\n", myuint16);
printf("integer equivalent of myuint32 is %d\n", myuint32);
printf("character equivalent of myint is %c\n", myint);
printf("integer equivalent of myshort is %d\n", myshort);
return 0;
}
The result is:
integer equivalent of mychar is 100
integer equivalent of myuint8 is 8
integer equivalent of myuint16 is 16
integer equivalent of myuint32 is 32
character equivalent of myint is d
integer equivalent of myshort is 26945
And now I discovered that %d does not work for any variable that needs larger than 32 bit to be stored. After considering this question I have some idea about implementation dependence of size_t, maybe in my system it was unsigned long (%ld also giving the result proves it). So maybe if size_t was an unsigned int in my system I would get a result, is it true?
As it can be seen from the code above, %c decodes the last 8 bits of int as a character, why %d does not do the same (i.e. decode the last 32 bits of content of size_t variable as it was int? I believe if it would do so we could get the same result for small enough numbers, and this was what I meant when I initially asked the question).
The
sizeofoperator evaluates to a value of typesize_t. This type is unsigned and typically larger than anint, which is why you get the warning.Using the wrong format specifier to
printfinvokes undefined behavior. You can get away with this however for types smaller thanintdue to the rules of integer promotions in section 6.3.1.1p2 of the C standard:So as long this doesn't result in a change from unsigned to signed, types smaller than
intcan be printed with%d.The proper type modifier for
size_tis%zu, as per section 7.21.6.1p7 of the C standard regarding length modifiers for thefprintffunction (and by extension,printf):So what you want is: