If I have a variable number of sets (let's call the number n), which have at most m elements each, what's the most efficient way to calculate the pairwise intersections for all pairs of sets? Note that this is different from the intersection of all n sets.
For example, if I have the following sets:
A={"a","b","c"}
B={"c","d","e"}
C={"a","c","e"}
I want to be able to find:
intersect_AB={"c"}
intersect_BC={"c", "e"}
intersect_AC={"a", "c"}
Another acceptable format (if it makes things easier) would be a map of items in a given set to the sets that contain that same item. For example:
intersections_C={"a": {"A", "C"},
"c": {"A", "B", "C"}
"e": {"B", "C"}}
I know that one way to do so would be to create a dictionary mapping each value in the union of all n sets to a list of the sets in which it occurs and then iterate through all of those values to create lists such as intersections_C
above, but I'm not sure how that scales as n increases and the sizes of the set become too large.
Some additional background information:
- Each of the sets are of roughly the same length, but are also very large (large enough that storing them all in memory is a realistic concern, and an algorithm which avoids that would be preferred though is not necessary)
- The size of the intersections between any two sets is very small compared to the size of the sets themselves
- If it helps, we can assume anything we need to about the ordering of the input sets.
this ought to do what you want
mock some data
generate an index list of the sets in S so the sets can be referenced more concisely below
get all possible unique pairs of the items in S; however, since set intersection is commutative, we want the combinations rather than permutations
write a function perform the set intersection
fold this function over the pairs & key the result from each function call to its arguments
the result below, formatted per the first option recited in the OP, is a dictionary in which the values are the set intersections of two sequences; each values keyed to a tuple comprised of the two indices of those sequences
this solution, is really just two lines of code: (i) calculate the permutations; (ii) then apply some function over each permutation, storing the returned value in a structured container (key-value) container
the memory footprint of this solution is minimal, but you can do even better by returning a generator expression in the last step, ie
notice that with this approach, neither the sequence of pairs nor the corresponding intersections have been written out in memory--ie, both pairs and res are iterators.