I am using custom batch script to make resized copies (33% and 66%) of all PNG images in folder. Here is my code:
for f in $(find /myFolder -name '*.png');
do
sudo cp -a $f "${f/%.png/-3x.png}";
sudo convert $f -resize 66.67% "${f/%.png/-2x.png}";
sudo convert $f -resize 33.33% $f;
done
It works fine, except when the original image is indexed. In this case the smaller version of the image is RGB (so even larger file size then original image).
I have try several versions but not worked. One that I guess supposed to sort this out was fallowing:
for f in $(find /myFolder -name '*.png');
do
sudo cp -a $f "${f/%.png/-3x.png}";
sudo convert $f -define png:preserve-colormap -resize 66.67% "${f/%.png/-2x.png}";
sudo convert $f -define png:preserve-colormap -resize 33.33% $f;
done
But it doesn't work.
EDIT:
This is updated co, but it still doesn't work as it supposed to (see the attached image-left is original, right is resized):
for f in $(find /myFolder -name '*.png');
do
sudo cp -a $f "${f/%.png/-3x.png}";
numberOfColors=`identify -format "%k" $f`
convert "$f" \
\( +clone -resize 66.67% -colors $numberOfColors -write "${f/%.png/-2x.png}" +delete \) \
-resize 33.33% -colors $numberOfColors "$f"
done
There are several things to address here...
find vs glob
You say you want to process all files in a folder, then you use
find
which will search down into sub-directories as well. If you just want to process files in the current directory, you can letbash
do the globbing directly for you. So, instead ofyou can just do:
Performance
You run
convert
twice and load the original image twice, and that is not very efficient. You can run a single process that loads a single image and resizes to two different sizes and writes both to disk. So, instead ofyou can write the following to start one
convert
, read the image once, clone it in memory and write it out, delete the spare copy in memory and then resize the original image and re-save that.Palette
It seems you actually only want to output palettised (indexed) images with "any" colormap rather than with a "specific" colormap. Glenn's answer is perfect if you want to retain a specific colormap. However, if any colormap is ok, you can use
-colors
to reduce the colours in the resulting image to a level where the PNG library can make the decision to create a palettised image. Glenn knows a lot more than me about that as he wrote it! However, I think if you reduce the colours to 250 (or so) you will probably get a 256 entry colormap and if you reduce the colours to around 60 or so, you will get a 64 entry colourmap. So, you would do:You can try experimenting with other numbers of colours and see how that affects filesize - the number you need will depend on your images.