How effective are tools such as w3af in looking for web app vulnerabilities compared to looking for vulnerabilities manually? Are they able to find all vulnerabilities from OWASP top 10 such as reflected xss, persistent xss, sqli, lfi/rfi, and unrestricted file upload? Or will some vulnerabilities fall through the cracks and remain undiscovered?
W3af vs manual penetration testing
204 Views Asked by user3035360 At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PENETRATION-TESTING
- X-FRAME-OPTIONS header missing on step1.html of Keycloak
- How do I access an iOS app's SQLite database?
- Can Ettercap capture API requests made in Postman?
- Make AWS default security groups limit all inbound and outbound traffic
- How to resolve API Mass Assignment in web method having single parameter?
- Mobile Pen-Testing approach for chatbox functionality
- Struggling with "API - Mass Assignment" Challenge on Root-Me: Seeking Insights
- Issue in installing apk file in rooted device ( INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NO_CERTIFICATES )
- filesystem.py is unable to be read even though the file exists and my user has all permissions for the file (sqlmap)
- How to perform Source Code Scanning on a code that is using RSA Key Container
- Python request.get function returning 404 on all directories even valid ones
- Anti debugging protection for React Native App
- SQLMAP - POST parameter 'password' does not seem to be injectable
- Laravel warning on penetration with owasp zap
- Is there any way to run the React Native app on Android while making android:exported as "false" in AndroidManifest.xml file without an error?
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
You cannot possibliy find all the vulnerabilities through one method --manual or auto--, it is the halting problem. An automated method will consistently find some, but will surely lack coverage, may produce false positive alarms and will also fail to investigate a potential vulnerability with sufficent depth to uncover it. A manual procedure, can be better or worse, depending on the skills of the tester and how much resources he invests.