I have the following example. I try to pass the options
parameter via calling super(...)
. When I do this, I don't get 2 output channels as I specified, instead I only get 1 output channel.
class Processor extends AudioWorkletProcessor {
constructor() {
super({outputChannelCount: [2]});
}
process(inputs, outputs, parameters) {
console.log("output channels: ", outputs[0].length);
return true;
}
}
registerProcessor('processor', Processor);
When I try the same passing the options
to the AudioWorkletNode
instead, like in the following example, it works as expected.
let audioContext = new AudioContext();
(async () => {
await audioContext.audioWorklet.addModule('processor.js');
audioWorkletNode = new AudioWorkletNode(audioContext, 'processor', {outputChannelCount: [2]});
audioWorkletNode.connect(audioContext.destination);
})();
This is not working in any browser I tried.
Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug? Is there something in the Web Audio API specification that I am missing here?
I think what you describe is expected. The constructor of an
AudioWorkletProcessor
doesn't take any arguments as defined by the IDL definition here:https://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#AudioWorkletProcessor
The options that you pass to the
AudioWorkletNode
constructor on the main thread get stored as something called thepending processor construction data
. They get applied automatically and there is no way to change them from within the processor.I guess this is to make sure the
AudioWorkletNode
and its correspondingAudioWorkletProcessor
always have the same configuration. If you could change the configuration within the processor theAudioWorkletNode
would be out of sync until the information travelled back again.