What is a reason NOT to make a Core Data property indexed? From what I understand, searchable properties are supposed to be indexed, if it helps performance. If so, why isn't everything automatically indexed "internally"? Why must I turn it on/off for applicable properties, and what is the reason not to index a property? If it's not automatically applied to everything, there must be a reason. What might that be?
What is a reason NOT to make a Core Data property indexed?
1.3k Views Asked by Moshe At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in IOS
- Overlapping UICollectionView in storyboard
- Cannot pod spec lint because of undeclared type errors
- Is the transactionReceipt data present in dataWithContentsOfURL?
- UIWebView Screen Fitting Issue
- ZXingObjC encoding issues
- iOS: None of the valid provisioning profiles allowed the specific entitlements
- How to hide "Now playing url" in control center
- CloudKit: Preventing Duplicate Records
- Slow performance on ipad erasing image
- Swift code with multiple NSDateFormatter - optimization
- iOS 8.3 Safari crashes on input type=file
- TTTTimeIntervalFormatter always returns strings in English
- How do I add multiple in app purchases in Swift Spritekit?
- Setup code for xibs in iOS. -awakFromNb:
- iOS Voice Over only reads out the title of any alert views
Related Questions in CORE-DATA
- Swift code with multiple NSDateFormatter - optimization
- IOS Where To Persist Current User from Back-end
- iCloud Core Data "no document at URL"
- restrict sqlite-wal and sqlite-shm from icloud backup
- Delegate returning nil - Swift
- How to set a core-data attibute to nil, in Swift?
- iOS make task run on background thread Thread safe?
- Calling method on object in NSPredicate with Core Data
- How to get Managed Object context from RestKit 0.20
- Write NSData in NSHomeDirectory
- My app is crashing when I assign the managed object context to a variable
- Fetch unique object based on attribute name from coredata
- NSPredicate filter part of array
- Property 'package_number_7' not found on object of type 'User *' after Lightweight Migration
- Core Data relationship Many-To One
Related Questions in INDEXED-PROPERTIES
- C# WPF Binding to indexed property - what am I doing wrong?
- Why is this code throwing ReferenceError #1069?
- Using F# Indexed Properties in a Type
- How to use PropertyUtils to get an element from a list inside a map?
- Finding the largest value of an indexed property in AppEngine
- Non-integer indexed Indexer properties in C#
- Using Reflection to set the value of an indexed property
- Validate elements of a String array with Java Bean Validation
- Using stripes indexed properties to populate a map
- Deleting an item from an indexed property - JavaBeans question
- Binding-driven Indexed Property Doesn't Return
- How can I define a custom object (table) in in indexed database?
- How do bind indexed property to jface viewer
- What is a reason NOT to make a Core Data property indexed?
- Delphi open array as property index in indexed property
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Indexes aren't free. Each additional index will increase the size of the Core Data store somewhat, as well as making it take slightly longer to save entities. So, if an index on a given property will never be used, or if it's used rarely enough that the performance bonus from having it indexed isn't significant, performance (and storage usage) will actually be better overall without the index.