I recently switched over to developing my software for Java 8, and I've been slowly improving my use of Java 8 and becoming comfortable with Java 8, and in doing so I've started implementing more and more functional interfaces, and recently NetBeans has started to suggest that I swap some of my for loops over to functional interfaces, but from the way the program is running it seems much slower than simply using a for loop (1.9 sec runtime vs. .9 sec respectively). So my question is-- is it worth using functional interfaces in the place of for loops? When in general should one use functional interfaces? Are functional interfaces more efficient in some other ways? Thanks in advance.
When to use functional interface? (Java 8)
3k Views Asked by erzr2 At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PERFORMANCE
- Slow performance on ipad erasing image
- Can Apache Ant be told to cache its XML files?
- What are the pros and cons of the picture element?
- DB candidate as CouchDB/Schema replacement
- python member str performance too slow
- Split a large query (2 days) into pieces to increase the speed in Postgres
- Use GUI displayed results of SQL query vs new queries?
- fastest way to map a large number of longs
- Bash regular expression execution hangs on long expressions
- Why is calling a function so slow in Javascript?
- Performance of element-compare in java collections
- "Capture GPU Frame" in XCode -- iOS only?
- Efficiency penalty of initializing a struct/class within a loop
- Change the rotating speed of the circle when the mouse moves using javascript
- Replace foreach to make loop into queryable
Related Questions in JAVA-8
- Why do we need to avoid mutations while coding? What is a mutation?
- Collecting inner List from outer List using Java 8
- How to get the index and max value of an array in one shot?
- Why did Java 8 introduce *Integer.sum(int a, int b)*
- How to stop a reduce operation mid way based on some condition?
- Create a pointcut based on annotation parameters
- How should I be using LambdaMetaFactory in my use case?
- How to sort an IntStream in reverse order
- ArrayOutOfBoundsException on Bean creation while using Java 8 constructs
- Java 8: stop reduction operation from examining all Stream elements
- In Ubuntu java -version gives Error occurred during initialization of VM
- Builder pattern with a Java 8 Stream
- resin project, jdk8 has a high cpu load ,but jdk7 not
- Center JoptionPaneMessageDialog in parent element of the source element that generated the event
- Implementing swing in jdk 1.8 using eclipse
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-INTERFACE
- java 8 function invocation
- java 8 - store method in HashMap and get return value from method in map
- Method overriding and Functional Interface complie error
- java 8 - declare method to use in map, and pass the value to the method later on
- Why should a single method interface be tagged @FunctionalInterface?
- Functional interface that return void and passes a boolean parameter
- Retry once using functional interface
- FunctionalInterface with two non-default methods
- Why we do need to write "implements InterfaceName" while implementing a Functional Interface?
- Can you use a method reference to define a class implementing a Functional interface in java 8
- Is @FunctionalInterface necessary in jdk8
- Is this possible to do using plain BiFunction in method definition
- Comprehensive list of all functional interfaces in JDK outside java.function package
- Mapping an object using a List<UnaryOperator<...>>
- Why must I catch exceptions when providing lambda argument?
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
if your lambdas do not use many capturing variables, then i believe that the performance will be more comparable to a standard for loop. the the advantages of using lambdas are easier parallelization (although for ordered streams this could potentially result in slower performance), and an easier to read syntax. also be aware that the hotspot compiler will change the results over time (your first loop execution will most likely be slower than your last).
i do not know the specifics, but in the worst case situation, you lambda may be implemented as an anonymous class. in the best case, it will just be a MethodHandle.
a quick test:
the results:
for a parallel stream the results where actually slower (around 2x on my machine) because the stream was ordered and each thread has a lot of synchronization overhead, compared to the work being done (just
result = i)