This link talks about allowing more restrictive access to a derived class method.
Q. What is the reason for allowing this in C++?
Languages such as Java & C# don't allow it. Is it useful in some cases? If so please help me understand.
Why C++ allows to give more restrictive access to a derived class method?
174 Views Asked by Destructor At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in C++
- What is `_dereq_()` inside React?
- React TypeError: React.renderComponent is not a function
- React - saving a component in the ref callback
- React Rails component: manually triggering a re-render
- React, ES6 - getInitialState was defined on a plain JavaScript class
- How to get multiple selected options value in React JS?
- React.render replace container instead of inserting into
- reactjs datagrid use html
- props is not initialized in react component
- How to display xml data using Reactjs
Related Questions in ACCESS-SPECIFIER
- What is `_dereq_()` inside React?
- React TypeError: React.renderComponent is not a function
- React - saving a component in the ref callback
- React Rails component: manually triggering a re-render
- React, ES6 - getInitialState was defined on a plain JavaScript class
- How to get multiple selected options value in React JS?
- React.render replace container instead of inserting into
- reactjs datagrid use html
- props is not initialized in react component
- How to display xml data using Reactjs
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
It has more to do with it never being disallowed. And now it's too late: too much code would break. Do remember that C++ is a considerably older language than either Java or C#.
But the C++ philosophy inspires you to ask "why disallow it?". It could even be useful: some folk exploit it and make overridden methods private. The amount of documentation you should attach to a private method can be significantly less than a public method. This means you don't repeat yourself and are compelled to rely on the public / protected method in a base class for comments.