I'm using boost::geometry::index::rtree with the point type given by Eigen::Vector. To do this, I'm declaring
namespace boost
{
namespace geometry
{
namespace traits
{
template<typename T, std::size_t D> struct tag<Eigen::Vector<T, D>> { using type = point_tag; };
template<typename T, std::size_t D> struct dimension<Eigen::Vector<T, D>> : boost::mpl::int_<D> {};
template<typename T, std::size_t D> struct coordinate_type<Eigen::Vector<T, D>> { using type = T; };
template<typename T, std::size_t D> struct coordinate_system<Eigen::Vector<T, D>> { using type = boost::geometry::cs::cartesian; };
template<typename T, std::size_t D, std::size_t Index>
struct access<Eigen::Vector<T, D>, Index>
{
static_assert(Index < D, "out of range");
using Point = Eigen::Vector<T, D>;
using CoordinateType = typename coordinate_type<Point>::type;
static inline CoordinateType get(Point const& p) { return p[Index]; }
static inline void set(Point& p, CoordinateType const& value) { p[Index] = value; }
};
} // namespace traits
} // namespace geometry
} // namespace boost
Then I declare
template<class PointType>
using rtree = boost::geometry::index::rtree<PointType, boost::geometry::index::rstar<16>>;
and rtree<std::pair<Eigen::Vector<double, 2>, std::size_t>> foo;. While this perfectly compiles using MSVC, I'm receiving the error
error: static assertion failed: The first type of std::pair has to be an Indexable. 24 | static_assert(boost::geometry::detail::static_assert_check<(CHECK), VA_ARGS>::value, MESSAGE)
when I compile it under Linux/GCC. What's going wrong here and how do I fix it?
Somehow, GCC doesn't match the partial template specialization unless you make
std::size_t Dtemplate parameterint.This probably has to do with an internal interpretation of narrowing restrictions, but I feel it might have been a bug (in some version(s) of GCC?). Clang 15 accepts it just like you report MSVC did.
Changing that fixes it on my GCC versions as well:
Live On Compiler Explorer