I can return a kj::Exception where a kj::Promise is expected, like so:
kj::Promise<void> someFunc() {
return KJ_EXCEPTION(FAILED, "some description");
}
But what if I end up having a kj::Promise<kj::Exception> in a place where I don't have a waitScope? For instance:
kj::Promise<void> someFunc(kj::Promise<void> somePromise) {
return somePromise.then([]() {
return KJ_EXCEPTION(FAILED, "some description");
});
}
There my compiler complains that there is no valid conversion between kj::Promise<kj::Exception> and kj::Promise<void>.
Is there a way around that?
I'm a little surprised that I didn't prohibit
Promise<Exception>in the first place; using such a construction likely leads to a lot of problems.You can avoid it in your code by explicitly declaring the return type of the lambda to be
Promise<void>, i.e.: