I'm trying to convert a fraction to floating point and use it for comparison. but the values are too small and it returns true for the results of the Boolean variables. is my converision correct ? or should I do it in another way which I don't know ?
A test case:
// result is -0.0074
float coilh0re = fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].re)*0.8f;
// result is -0.0092
float coilrefundamental = fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reFundamental);
// result is -0.01123
float coilh0re2 = fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].re)*1.2f;
-0.0074>-0.0092> -0.01123
here is a snipped of the code
bool resultA = fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].re)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reFundamental) ? 1 : 0;
bool resultB = fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reFundamental) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].re)*1.2f ? 1 : 0;
bool resultAB = !(resultA & resultB); // always true
bool resultC = fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].re)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reHarmonic) ? 1:0;
bool resultD = fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reHarmonic) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].re)*1.2f ? 1:0;
bool resultCD = !(resultC & resultD); // always true
bool resultE = fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].im)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imFundamental)? 1 : 0;
bool resultF = fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imFundamental) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].im)*1.2f ? 1 : 0;
bool resultEF = !(resultE & resultF);// always true
bool resultG = fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].im)*0.8f < CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imHarmonic ? 1 : 0;
bool resultH = fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imHarmonic) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].im)*1.2f ? 1 : 0;
bool resultGH = !(resultG & resultH);// always true
if(! ((fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].re)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reFundamental)) && (fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reFundamental) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].re)*1.2f) )
|| ! ((fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].re)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reHarmonic)) && (fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.reHarmonic) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].re)*1.2f) )
|| ! ((fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].im)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imFundamental)) && (fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imFundamental) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[0].im)*1.2f) )
|| ! ((fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].im)*0.8f < fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imHarmonic)) && (fr32_to_float(CoilEepromData.coilboardhspule.imHarmonic) <= fr32_to_float(GO_coil_H[1].im)*1.2f) ) )
{
eUserCode = E_USER_SOIL_FAILED;
eProcessState = E_ERROR_HANDLING;
}
}
If appears OP wants to test if a value
reFundamental
is in range +/-20% ofre
. This is not afloat
precision issue, but a math one.But the values are negative and so the
<
and<=
should be reversed.Various alternatives. Example: (Adjust to taste)