For example, let's say we have to trigger a function when component mounts. For me, I have two options to doing it.
first one is using useRef() hook.
import { useCallback } from "react";
export default function Test() {
const ref = useCallback((node) => {
if (node) {
console.log("mounts");
}
}, []);
return (
<main>
<div ref={ref}>TEST</div>
</main>
);
}
second one is using useEffect() hook.
import { useEffect } from "react";
export default function Test() {
useEffect(() => {
console.log("mounts");
}, []);
return (
<main>
<div>TEST</div>
</main>
);
}
expected behaviors are showing 'mounts' in console when component mounts and both of them work properly.
The first one might not work if <div> is somehow out of DOM but I'll suppose there are no conditional differences.
In this situation, Is there any possible disadvantages using either of them or differences?
From this question, I want to know about
- difference between two methods of displaying 'mounts' in console.
- possible disadvantage or advantage using either of them
Using useCallback with useRef:
Using useCallback with useRef allows you to store a value in the useRef hook and use it in the callback function. This is useful when you need to refer to a value that doesn't change over time, such as a constant or a configuration.
Using useEffect:
Using useEffect allows you to perform an action when a component mounts, such as displaying a message in the console. This is useful for performing initialization work or setting up subscriptions. Unlike useCallback, useEffect does not require a useRef hook.
Possible Disadvantage:
Using useCallback with useRef may require more code than using useEffect, as it requires creating a useRef hook and setting a value inside it.
Possible Advantage:
Using useCallback with useRef allows you to access a value that doesn't change over time, which can be useful in some cases.