I'm developing a project that will use XML files to dump data for sharing between servers. Does it matter if I use an extension other than .xml in the file name? eg. 'myfile.abc' instead of 'myfile.xml'.
These files would be read by client servers using CURL / LWP commands. Are there any issues with MIME-TYPES that might cause the files to be unopenable or unreadable as XML? (They will be W3C compliant XML files)
The reason is we need the files to be distinguishable from other XML files on the server. Thanks.

The W3C XML Recommendation specifies nothing about an XML file's name or extension.
However, an application or operating system may rely on a file extension to identify file content type. There's also no guarantee how any given application would interpret conflicting signals from a file's MIME type and its file extension.
Recommendation: Stick with the conventional
.xmlfile extension for XML files. To make "the files to be distinguishable from other XML files on the server," use a suitable naming convention on the base file name instead.