Question

Copy constructor required to be explicity defined with mutex

score 228 · Answer 1 · 2015-06-10 07:27:11

228

Views

Copy constructor required to be explicity defined with mutex

Published on 10 June 2015 at 07:27

score 700 · Answer 2 · 2011-02-07 23:06:52

700

Views

Does the implicitly defined copy constructor in C++ call copy constructor for members too right?

Published on 07 February 2011 at 23:06

score 208 · Answer 3 · 2014-12-04 20:18:49

208

Views

Intercept C++ implicit copy constructor, or invoke its functionality

Published on 04 December 2014 at 20:18

score 393 · Answer 4 · 2022-04-21 12:05:36

393

Views

std::is_trivially_copyable is too strong, what shall I use instead?

Published on 21 April 2022 at 12:05

score 166 · Answer 5 · 2018-11-22 02:10:38

166

Views

Why does defaulted-move-ctor inhibit implicit-copy-ctor but not defaulted-copy-ctor?

Published on 22 November 2018 at 02:10

score 121 · Answer 6 · 2018-11-24 19:24:28

121

Views

Can i create class objects with a class that just offers a copy constructor?

Published on 24 November 2018 at 19:24

score 302 · Answer 7 · 2009-10-30 02:15:32

302

Views

Do shallow copies share pointers? (C++)

Published on 30 October 2009 at 02:15

score 50k · Answer 8 · 2009-11-27 18:41:17

50k

Views

C++ implicit copy constructor for a class that contains other objects

Published on 27 November 2009 at 18:41

score 200 · Answer 9 · 2012-08-13 14:48:01

200

Views

Do I still get default copy constructor and operator= if I define ones with non-const arguments?

Published on 13 August 2012 at 14:48

score 131 · Answer 10 · 2020-07-13 15:07:17

131

Views

how to return the result of addition of two objects of a class

Published on 13 July 2020 at 15:07

score 1.2k · Answer 11 · 2014-05-18 13:32:13

1.2k

Views

Uncopyable class with automatic default and move constructors

Published on 18 May 2014 at 13:32

score 58 · Answer 12 · 2022-11-04 15:59:58

58

Views

Syntax and overloading copy constructor

Published on 04 November 2022 at 15:59

score 23 · Answer 13 · 2022-11-28 12:08:10

23

Views

C++ Default and Copy Constructor

Published on 28 November 2022 at 12:08

score 276 · Answer 14 · 2017-05-23 23:45:09

276

Views

How to measure the performance of a default copy constructor in C++

Published on 23 May 2017 at 23:45

score 50 · Answer 15 · 2018-05-14 13:45:09

50

Views

Code involving default copy constructor should segfault, but works just fine

Published on 14 May 2018 at 13:45

score 62 · Answer 16 · 2018-08-04 17:32:51

62

Views

Why my Class work properly, Even after returning junk value as return for assignment operator and empty copy constructor?

Published on 04 August 2018 at 17:32

score 3.8k · Answer 17 · 2011-11-21 20:53:00

3.8k

Views

In C++0x, do non-static data member initializers override the implicit copy constructor?

Published on 21 November 2011 at 20:53

score 147 · Answer 18 · 2011-04-27 21:14:46

147

Views

avoid copy by value when initializing reference

Published on 27 April 2011 at 21:14

score 3k · Answer 19 · 2015-06-07 00:23:20

3k

Views

Is C++'s default copy-constructor inherently unsafe? Are iterators fundamentally unsafe too?

Published on 07 June 2015 at 00:23

score 399 · Answer 20 · 2013-07-29 00:51:30

399

Views

Why is this copy constructor necessary

Published on 29 July 2013 at 00:51

List Question

Copy constructor required to be explicity defined with mutex

Does the implicitly defined copy constructor in C++ call copy constructor for members too right?

Intercept C++ implicit copy constructor, or invoke its functionality

std::is_trivially_copyable is too strong, what shall I use instead?

Why does defaulted-move-ctor inhibit implicit-copy-ctor but not defaulted-copy-ctor?

Can i create class objects with a class that just offers a copy constructor?

Do shallow copies share pointers? (C++)

C++ implicit copy constructor for a class that contains other objects

Do I still get default copy constructor and operator= if I define ones with non-const arguments?

how to return the result of addition of two objects of a class

Uncopyable class with automatic default and move constructors

Syntax and overloading copy constructor

C++ Default and Copy Constructor

How to measure the performance of a default copy constructor in C++

Code involving default copy constructor should segfault, but works just fine

Why my Class work properly, Even after returning junk value as return for assignment operator and empty copy constructor?

In C++0x, do non-static data member initializers override the implicit copy constructor?

avoid copy by value when initializing reference

Is C++'s default copy-constructor inherently unsafe? Are iterators fundamentally unsafe too?

Why is this copy constructor necessary

Trending Questions

Popular # Hahtags

Popular Questions