Question

Copy constructor not called when initializing an object with return value of a function

score 921 · Answer 1 · 2014-11-14 19:16:02

921

Views

Copy constructor not called when initializing an object with return value of a function

Published on 14 November 2014 at 19:16

score 162 · Answer 2 · 2014-11-16 05:41:11

162

Views

Copy constructor not called when returning from overloaded + operator to overloaded = operator

Published on 16 November 2014 at 05:41

score 203 · Answer 3 · 2014-11-24 04:51:58

203

Views

Why is return value optimization happening here

Published on 24 November 2014 at 04:51

score 235 · Answer 4 · 2013-12-17 11:36:51

235

Views

RVO, move semantics and the struggle towards optimal code

Published on 17 December 2013 at 11:36

score 487 · Answer 5 · 2013-12-17 12:50:06

487

Views

How does the compiler determine when is it safe to RVO?

Published on 17 December 2013 at 12:50

score 1.1k · Answer 6 · 2017-09-06 02:00:21

1.1k

Views

Why isn't RVO applied to base class subobject initialization?

Published on 06 September 2017 at 02:00

score 3k · Answer 7 · 2011-01-28 07:24:29

3k

Views

How to return an fstream (C++0x)

Published on 28 January 2011 at 07:24

score 619 · Answer 8 · 2011-02-15 18:13:42

619

Views

Return value optimization of values unpacked from std::tuple

Published on 15 February 2011 at 18:13

score 57 · Answer 9 · 2023-11-09 16:34:38

57

Views

Is passing the uninitialized variable to function considered UB in C++?

Published on 09 November 2023 at 16:34

score 126 · Answer 10 · 2023-12-18 00:31:37

126

Views

C++17 Copy elision object lifetime

Published on 18 December 2023 at 00:31

score 158 · Answer 11 · 2023-12-17 03:59:23

158

Views

Prvalue semantics object lifetime

Published on 17 December 2023 at 03:59

score 3.3k · Answer 12 · 2011-11-03 15:32:40

3.3k

Views

Is it faster to return a value or modify a parameter passed by reference?

Published on 03 November 2011 at 15:32

score 422 · Answer 13 · 2021-04-24 17:39:36

422

Views

Unintuitive RVO of function returning non-copyable const value?

Published on 24 April 2021 at 17:39

score 219 · Answer 14 · 2021-04-27 09:56:13

219

Views

Why does non-trivial destructor of return type prevent tail-call optimization?

Published on 27 April 2021 at 09:56

score 202 · Answer 15 · 2021-05-05 07:41:16

202

Views

RVO or automatic move

Published on 05 May 2021 at 07:41

score 12.8k · Answer 16 · 2013-08-14 09:30:48

12.8k

Views

Returning std::move of a local variable

Published on 14 August 2013 at 09:30

score 1.5k · Answer 17 · 2012-07-30 22:04:31

1.5k

Views

Why is Visual C++ not performing return-value optimization on the most trivial code?

Published on 30 July 2012 at 22:04

score 162.1k · Answer 18 · 2012-10-18 11:03:03

162.1k

Views

What are copy elision and return value optimization?

Published on 18 October 2012 at 11:03

score 1.2k · Answer 19 · 2020-09-20 21:50:23

How does C++ return value optimization (RVO) work when the function get's called with the variable that the return value gets assigned to?

score 207 · Answer 20 · 2021-06-03 17:40:16

207

Views

Is std::declval outdated because of guaranteed copy elision?

Published on 03 June 2021 at 17:40

List Question

Copy constructor not called when initializing an object with return value of a function

Copy constructor not called when returning from overloaded + operator to overloaded = operator

Why is return value optimization happening here

RVO, move semantics and the struggle towards optimal code

How does the compiler determine when is it safe to RVO?

Why isn't RVO applied to base class subobject initialization?

How to return an fstream (C++0x)

Return value optimization of values unpacked from std::tuple

Is passing the uninitialized variable to function considered UB in C++?

C++17 Copy elision object lifetime

Prvalue semantics object lifetime

Is it faster to return a value or modify a parameter passed by reference?

Unintuitive RVO of function returning non-copyable const value?

Why does non-trivial destructor of return type prevent tail-call optimization?

RVO or automatic move

Returning std::move of a local variable

Why is Visual C++ not performing return-value optimization on the most trivial code?

What are copy elision and return value optimization?

How does C++ return value optimization (RVO) work when the function get's called with the variable that the return value gets assigned to?

Is std::declval outdated because of guaranteed copy elision?

Trending Questions

Popular # Hahtags

Popular Questions