FWIW, here is the start of the kmaps (not accurate due to conflicts between table and CKT):
Op = o2o1o0
o2:
f1\f0 0 1
p1p0\f3f2 00 01 11 10 p1p2\f3f2 00 01 11 10
00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
01 x x x x 01 x x x x
0
11 0 0 x x 11 x 0 x x
10 0 0 x x 10 x 0 x x
p1p0\f3f2 00 01 11 10 p1p2\f3f2 00 01 11 10
00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
01 x x x x 01 x x x x
1
11 1 x x 1 11 x x x x
10 1 x x 1 10 x x x x
o1:
f1\f0 0 1
p1p0\f3f2 00 01 11 10 p1p2\f3f2 00 01 11 10
00 1 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 1
01 x x x x 01 x x x x
0
11 1 0 x x 11 x 0 x x
10 1 0 x x 10 x 0 x x
p1p0\f3f2 00 01 11 10 p1p2\f3f2 00 01 11 10
00 1 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 1
01 x x x x 01 x x x x
1
11 1 x x 1 11 x x x x
10 1 x x 1 10 x x x x
o0:
f1\f0 0 1
p1p0\f3f2 00 01 11 10 p1p2\f3f2 00 01 11 10
00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
01 x x x x 01 x x x x
0
11 1 0 x x 11 x 1 x x
10 1 0 x x 10 x 1 x x
p1p0\f3f2 00 01 11 10 p1p2\f3f2 00 01 11 10
00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
01 x x x x 01 x x x x
1
11 0 x x 1 11 x x x x
10 0 x x 1 10 x x x x
The answer is that the question is flawed. The code below finds these flaws/"CONFLICTS":
0
FWIW, here is the start of the kmaps (not accurate due to conflicts between table and CKT): Op = o2o1o0