Although there is an interface named ISerializable
, it seems to purpose to customize details when a type is marked [Serializable]
attribute. If I understood correctly, the [Serializable]
attribute by itself does not touch anything on a type it is attached to, but at run-time things implementing IFormatter
determine if a given object is marked [Serializble]
attribute (through reflection? I guess). Also IFormatter.Serializble()
method takes just any Object
. Does it mean virtually every object in .NET can be serialized? If not, is there way to take only serializable objects and make a compile-time error if a non-serializable object is passed?
How can I make a method to take only serializable objects?
70 Views Asked by minhee At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in .NET
- new thread blocks main thread
- Extracting viewCount & SubscriberCount from YouTube API V3 for a given channel, where channelID does not equal userID
- Display images on Django Template Site
- Difference between list() and dict() with generators
- How can I serialize a numpy array while preserving matrix dimensions?
- Protractor did not run properly when using browser.wait, msg: "Wait timed out after XXXms"
- Why is my program adding int as string (4+7 = 47)?
- store numpy array in mysql
- how to omit the less frequent words from a dictionary in python?
- Update a text file with ( new words+ \n ) after the words is appended into a list
Related Questions in SERIALIZABLE
- new thread blocks main thread
- Extracting viewCount & SubscriberCount from YouTube API V3 for a given channel, where channelID does not equal userID
- Display images on Django Template Site
- Difference between list() and dict() with generators
- How can I serialize a numpy array while preserving matrix dimensions?
- Protractor did not run properly when using browser.wait, msg: "Wait timed out after XXXms"
- Why is my program adding int as string (4+7 = 47)?
- store numpy array in mysql
- how to omit the less frequent words from a dictionary in python?
- Update a text file with ( new words+ \n ) after the words is appended into a list
Related Questions in TYPE-SAFETY
- new thread blocks main thread
- Extracting viewCount & SubscriberCount from YouTube API V3 for a given channel, where channelID does not equal userID
- Display images on Django Template Site
- Difference between list() and dict() with generators
- How can I serialize a numpy array while preserving matrix dimensions?
- Protractor did not run properly when using browser.wait, msg: "Wait timed out after XXXms"
- Why is my program adding int as string (4+7 = 47)?
- store numpy array in mysql
- how to omit the less frequent words from a dictionary in python?
- Update a text file with ( new words+ \n ) after the words is appended into a list
Related Questions in ISERIALIZABLE
- new thread blocks main thread
- Extracting viewCount & SubscriberCount from YouTube API V3 for a given channel, where channelID does not equal userID
- Display images on Django Template Site
- Difference between list() and dict() with generators
- How can I serialize a numpy array while preserving matrix dimensions?
- Protractor did not run properly when using browser.wait, msg: "Wait timed out after XXXms"
- Why is my program adding int as string (4+7 = 47)?
- store numpy array in mysql
- how to omit the less frequent words from a dictionary in python?
- Update a text file with ( new words+ \n ) after the words is appended into a list
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
No, there is no way to do this for all types that might be serializable, except perhaps by writing a custom Roslyn analyzer that applies the exact rules you want, and adds the warnings that you want. This is a lot of work, and it may be simpler to simply add unit tests / integration tests that cover the serialization scenarios that you intend to support.
Additional notes:
[Serializable]
is a pseudo-attribute - it actually maps to an IL flag, not a regular attribute annotation, and additionally it is only used by some serializers (very much not all)ISerializable
/IFormatter
APIs are generally the last serializers you want to use for most general purpose scenarios - they are typically much more brittle and type-bound that other more forgiving serializers (json, xml, protobuf etc)No. However, different serializers have different rules for when things can be serialized, and those rules are often multiple and varied... i.e. it can look like X or like Y or like Z. As such, the only API that accepts all 3 is:
object