Say I've got a Distributive instance written for some complex custom type, Foo.
Is it possible to write Foo's Representable instance using only the properties available from its Distributive instance? And, if not, then why is Distributive a superclass of Representable?
How to write a Representable instance using only Distributive properties?
350 Views Asked by dbanas At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in HASKELL
- Cabal sandbox is using a global dependency. Could not resolve
- Haskell lens: let binding of Traversal'
- How can I parse fixed-length, non-delimited integers with attoparsec?
- Pipeline-like operation using TChan
- compile-time vs. run-time cost of Hamlet templates
- Date-time package in haskell - error in the current one, can't find an analog
- How does one debug infinite recursion in Haskell?
- Force GHC using local files
- List with random numbers in Haskell
- Changes in other elements based on listbox selections in threepenny-gui
- Multithreading and gtk2hs
- Operator section for applicative with <$> and <*>
- Unable to create a custom header to use it in "withManager"
- How do I reuse an intermediate value in chain of Haskell Either binds?
- Haskell, Tree problems
Related Questions in TYPECLASS
- How to Rewrite Function Using Context Bounds?
- Specifying a constraint for a class
- Resolving ambiguities for overloaded functions
- Existing constants (e.g. constructors) in type class instantiations
- Conversion from Function to sets of custom types
- Type class and dependent types
- Implicit not found when omitting empty argument list
- Persistent typeclass instances for existing libraries ADT's
- Haskell: `==' is not a (visible) method of class
- Instance of Show for lambda-abstraction ADT
- Typeclass instances for another typeclass in haskell
- What is the arrow in this instance declaration for?
- Illegal constraint in a superclass context (GHC 8.0.1)
- 'No type class instance was found' on multi-parameter type class
- Typeclass instantiated on every value of a data kind
Related Questions in REPRESENTABLE
- Set Initial View Offset for UITextView in SwiftUI
- How to represent object properties in given context?
- How to use the singletons library to define a HasRep instance for existentially quantified types?
- How to write reverseT without using List?
- Rails 4: Parsing JSONAPI using representable gem
- Make RoR nested representable into an array
- Mutate only focus of Store Comonad?
- Lenses over Comonads or Representable
- How to go from a value of a finite discrete type to a (Finite n) and back, using the type's derived Generic instance, in Haskell?
- When is Ap's Num instance lawful?
- Trailblazer Representable Change Property Name with Variable
- How to write a Representable instance using only Distributive properties?
- What is the role of Haskell's evaluation strategy in Memoization via Representable
- Quick Look preview via QLpreviewcontroller in Swiftui
- Strategy to create multiple representations for the same class based on criteria using ROAR gem?
Related Questions in DISTRIBUTIVE
- Why are traversals defined over Applicatives, fundamentally?
- What is a cocartesian comonoid, and what is a cocartesian comonoidal functor?
- Is there a name for this higher-level "bi" version of distribute in Haskell?
- Is there such thing as a bidistributive? What function do I need here?
- Can ZipList be Distributive?
- How to write a Representable instance using only Distributive properties?
- Is there any typeclass that defines the function from `a -> m b` to `m (a -> b)`?
- How can I get from `a -> Parser b` to `Parser (a -> b)`?
- Issue when using distributive conditional types combined with generic method
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
The superclass relationship between
DistributiveandRepresentable...... means that if
fis aRepresentable, then it also must be aDistributive, and not the other way around. When used for subclassing,=>should be read as "is a prerequisite of", rather than "implies". (This is, in fact, opposite to how it is when=>is used for constraints in type signatures. Purescript uses<=for subclassing for this very reason.)For most other pairs of superclass and subclass, the story would end here.
DistributiveandRepresentable, however, have a special relationship, in thatDistributivefunctors are actually representable, as stated by the documentation of bothDistributive...... and
Representable:The hierarchy is set up the way it is, with
Distributiveas the superclass, becauseDistributiveis meant to have a simpler interface which is expressible in Haskell 98, unlikeRepresentable(which uses a type family) andAdjunction(which is a multi-parameter type class). From a more conceptual point of view, while the distributive laws imply that everyDistributiveis representable, they are not enough for figuring out what the representation is. Getting our hands on the representation requires specifying it, either directly (as inRepresentable) or indirectly (as inAdjunction).