I have a Rails 4.2 framework and use Kaminari to paginate. Everything works great, but I want to test everything with Capybara, thus I run into the page conflict. So I wanted to rename the page_method_name of Kaminari and followed the guide from them:
$ bundle exec rails g Kaminari:config
This results in this file
app/config/initializers/kaminari_config.rb
Kaminari.configure do |config|
config.page_method_name = :plant
end
In which I simply uncommented the config.page_method_name and set it to :plant (as an example from the Kaminari docs to avoid any reserved method name conflicts for something like :kaminari_page). Then I adjusted the appropriate controller to
def index
@q = Interaction.published.order(updated_at: :desc).limit(200).ransack(params[:q])
@selection = @q.result
@interactions = Kaminari.paginate_array(@selection).plant(params[:page]).per(10)
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.js
end
end
I restarted everything and got this error when visiting the
undefined method `plant' for #Kaminari::PaginatableArray:0x00005568fb42ba30
Gemfile.lock:
kaminari (1.2.1)
activesupport (>= 4.1.0)
kaminari-actionview (= 1.2.1)
kaminari-activerecord (= 1.2.1)
kaminari-core (= 1.2.1)
kaminari-actionview (1.2.1)
actionview
kaminari-core (= 1.2.1)
kaminari-activerecord (1.2.1)
activerecord
kaminari-core (= 1.2.1)
kaminari-core (1.2.1)
I was then googling around and also added require 'kaminari' (which does not make so much sense, because I did not get the uninit constant error) and also included the Kaminari configure section into the class Application < Rails::Application inside config/application.rb. Nothing worked, always the same error.
You show your files location as
app/config/initializiers/kaminari_config.rb. If that is the actual location of your file it fully explains why the method doesn't exist. The location should beapp/config/initializers/kaminari_config.rb. With the location you specified it wouldn't be automatically loaded when the app starts.If the location you showed is just a type then that wouldn't be the cause, but if you didn't include Capybara into the global object, which you shouldn't be doing anyway, then you wouldn't have a name collision. Current versions of Capybara issue a warning when you do include it into the global object specifically for this reason.
Also is there any reason you're grabbing all the results and then paging them, rather than using the
page(orplant) andperscopes that would be defined on Interaction?