Can someone please explain to me why an LR(1) grammar that is not LALR(1) must have only reduce/reduce conflicts
Show that an LR(1) grammar that is not LALR(1) must have only reduce/reduce conflicts
443 Views Asked by django At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPILER-CONSTRUCTION
- Reference: Crafting Interpreters. Print statement is not able to evaluate expression. Help me fix this (details below)
- Load function written in amd64 assembly into memory and call it
- I have implemented till Statements and State in Tree Walk Interpreter. I am pissed with an error
- Resolve shift/reduction conflict in grammar for expressions in PLY for calls to embedded functions
- Grammar for access to properties and calls to embedded functions
- LLVM code generation causes problems with pointer arithmetic
- what does react compiler mean actually?
- Errors on Recursive Descent Parsing Java
- Java CUP produces Shift-Reduce conflict when parsing a grammar for a C++ type language
- Three-Address-Code (TAC) and Conjunction/Disjunction
- How do I write an implicit cast for my strongly typed interpreter? (C++)
- Yacc parser not reducing specific production rules as intended
- Why is the function version tag consistently "Base" in HDF5 library?
- Sly parser, how are recursively defined types implemented?
- Does a non terminal token need an explicit definition?
Related Questions in GRAMMAR
- Need clarification on pumping lemma for context free languages
- Grammar for combinations of Numpy arrays
- What is exactly Ruby's `not` keyword?
- VSCode Extension - Grammar Injection Into Multiple Languages
- Integrating Grammar/Spellcheck Tool in ASP.NET Application for Textarea
- Is the alternative operator in ABNF match first or longest?
- ANTLR4 matches to lexer rule instead of parser rule
- Distinguishing integer and decimal arithmetic with ohm.js
- Trouble with Island Grammar parsing unordered network configuration using Python textx
- ANTLR4 for Function Pointers in C
- Constructing grammar based on given rules
- Is this grammar LR(0) or SLR(1)
- ANTLR4 explain variable declaration error
- Bison ID reduction conflict
- SGF Grammar Parser with Peggy
Related Questions in LALR
- Is this grammar LALR(1)?
- Can the grammar of the concatenation of two lists with common elements be written as an LALR grammar without any collisions
- Repeating on the same rule again and again in CFG-parser
- can't understand this LALR(1) parsing algorithm in aho & Ullman book
- Accept an optional substring with Lark's LALR(1) parser
- LALR(1) Parser DFA Lookahead Core Question
- How to turn a Grammar to LR(0)
- How can I resolve this shift-reduce conflict?
- How to understand Example-4.64 of the syntax analysis chapter in Dragon Book?
- LALR, LR(1) and SLR
- How to resolve a shift/reduce conflict for nested lists using the same separator in JFLEX/CUP?
- LALR Grammar desambiguation for function calls statements (as in Python grammar)
- Should a merge failure stop the LR(1) to LALR(1) conversion
- How to handle operator precedence in LALR(1) parser
- Python LARK: terminal character inside text confusion
Related Questions in LR1
- Is this grammar LALR(1)?
- Does Golang have LR(1) grammar?
- LR(1) item sets for left recursive grammar
- Adding rule to Treesitter LR1 grammar changes precedence
- Show that an LR(1) grammar that is not LALR(1) must have only reduce/reduce conflicts
- Why does this Grammar work in LALR(1) but not LR(1)
- LR(1) Parser: Why adding an epsilon production makes r/r or s/r conflicts
- Is QML Grammar LALR(1)?
- Computing the FIRST & FOLLOW sets of a grammar
- LR(1) parsing, problem with look ahead symbols
- LR(1) table construction confusion
- How to Parse a given LALR(1) Grammar
- Can a grammar ever be parsed by LL(1) but not with LR(1)?
- Which productions are considered in LR(1) lookahead?
- LR(1) Shift/Reduce Disambiguation
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Because if there were a shift-reduce conflict, it would also exist in the LR(1) parser.
The proof is in pretty well every textbook which introduces LALR parsing. The LALR algorithm merges states with the same statesets, so the possible shift actions are the same in the merged state as in every one of the original states. Furthermore, every reduction action in the merged state is in at least one of the original states. So if a reduction action in the merged state conflicts with a shift action, it must also conflict with that shift action in the original state(s) in which the reduction action appears.