Can someone please explain to me why an LR(1) grammar that is not LALR(1) must have only reduce/reduce conflicts
Show that an LR(1) grammar that is not LALR(1) must have only reduce/reduce conflicts
442 Views Asked by django At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPILER-CONSTRUCTION
- Is the compiler Xcode uses to produce Assembly code a bad compiler?
- How do compilers store hundreds of variables in only a few registers?
- Where to patch back the information gathered during program analysis
- Assignment Insertion in ROSE compiler after AssignOp
- memory layout of a multiple-inherited object in C++
- How to use my written compiler to read files on web?
- a LEX program to identify keywords and convert it into uppercase
- Identifier terminal except certain keywords
- Calling Scala compiler's AST from Java
- Computing the FOLLOW() set of a grammar
- JavaCC and Unicode issue. Why \u696d cannot be managed in JavaCC although it belong to the range "\u4e00"-"\u9fff"
- Three-address code and symbol tables
- Delegate caching behavior changes in Roslyn
- Get delimiter in Irony
- Compiler Errors including initializer before '<' token
Related Questions in GRAMMAR
- VoiceXML Grammar Input sequence
- Is the grammars in Java7 spec really equivalent?
- int* const* foo(int x); is a valid C function prototype. How do you "read" this return type?
- Identifier terminal except certain keywords
- Grammar: Precedence of grammar alternatives
- Context Free Grammar BNF
- ANTLR4 grammar conflicting rules
- Is it incorrect online version of EBNF standard, or incorrect the chapter's name by mr. Pattis?
- Cross reference to multiple names in the same grammar rule
- Xtext grammar describing cron expression not working as expected
- What are the Bison/yacc grammars for these
- Correct way of conjugating 3rd person singular in comments
- Xtext grammar rule composite
- Trying to find Shift/Reduce conflict in Grammar
- Why do we need the alternative definition `nested-name-specifier identifier ::` in the definition of the grammar production `nested-name-specifier`?
Related Questions in LALR
- Bison - when is %prec really needed for unary operators?
- LALR parsers and look-ahead
- \[$end\] lookaheads in LALR
- Convert LALR to LL
- Is there a general way to convert an unambiguous context-free-grammar into a LALR(1) grammar?
- How to remove ambiguity in grammar using CUP?
- LALR(k) to LALR(1) factoring explanation and/or examples
- CUP LALR parser generator: warning: production never reduced
- Issues with Erlang's Yecc precedences
- Parsing an indentation-based syntax (like Python) with YECC
- Is this grammar LALR(1)?
- How can I resolve a reduce reduce conflict:
- What is the shift/reduce conflict in this SLY program?
- Grammar rules for parsing optional keywords from list of words with LALR
- How to resolve a shift/reduce conflict for nested lists using the same separator in JFLEX/CUP?
Related Questions in LR1
- what's the matter with this grammar
- Does Golang have LR(1) grammar?
- Is this grammar LALR(1)?
- Adding rule to Treesitter LR1 grammar changes precedence
- Why does this Grammar work in LALR(1) but not LR(1)
- Show that an LR(1) grammar that is not LALR(1) must have only reduce/reduce conflicts
- LR(1) parsing table with epsilon productions
- How do I translate LR(1) Parse into a Abstract syntax tree?
- Computing the FIRST & FOLLOW sets of a grammar
- Is QML Grammar LALR(1)?
- How to Parse a given LALR(1) Grammar
- Can a grammar ever be parsed by LL(1) but not with LR(1)?
- LR(1) table construction confusion
- Which productions are considered in LR(1) lookahead?
- LR1 Parser and Epsilon
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Because if there were a shift-reduce conflict, it would also exist in the LR(1) parser.
The proof is in pretty well every textbook which introduces LALR parsing. The LALR algorithm merges states with the same statesets, so the possible shift actions are the same in the merged state as in every one of the original states. Furthermore, every reduction action in the merged state is in at least one of the original states. So if a reduction action in the merged state conflicts with a shift action, it must also conflict with that shift action in the original state(s) in which the reduction action appears.