I have found the same problem when proving several lemmas: rules with an equality sometimes only work in one direction.
For instance, I'd like to use append_assoc to get from xs @ ys @ zs to (xs @ ys) @ zs, but since append_assoc is defined as (xs @ ys) @ zs = xs @ ys @ zs, I can't.
Is there any way to indicate I want to use some rule backwards?
Thanks in advance.
The rule with swapped left- and right-hand sides is obtained by applying an attribute
symmetricto the original rule: