With a new major release of the WS-I Basic Profile specification I was expecting to read about the use of WSDL 2.0. Unfortunatly I could not find this...
I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this.
With a new major release of the WS-I Basic Profile specification I was expecting to read about the use of WSDL 2.0. Unfortunatly I could not find this...
I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this.
Copyright © 2021 Jogjafile Inc.
This is what I know, not a final answer. The WS-I's mission is (was) not to push new standards into the market, but instead defining a common set of minimum standards to ensure interoperability between different WS-* platforms and vendors.
WSDL 2.0 was designed to solve those interop' issues identified in WSDL 1.0/1.1. So there is simply no need for future Basic Profiles. Some quotes from here: