I've been learning Rails and it seems that many prefer RSpec over Test Unit, but I've been reading that some like using both. If you created a Rails project without "-T" on "rails new..." so that you can keep yourself open to the possibility of using both later will there be any downside?
Rails/Rspec without using -T have any downside?
51 Views Asked by user2270029 At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RUBY-ON-RAILS
- Why does Googlebot crawl for /mobile/* and /m/* pages that are not referenced anywhere?
- is there any way to detect bots (like google) with JS?
- Dynamic content for googlebot
- Ajax used for image loading causes 404 errors
- How do I stop google from crawling my Bitly Branded short domain?
- How Googlebot is finding files that don't have a any link to?
- Can we detect when google bot crawl my page ASP.Net
- Googlebot link status code returns 200 when it should be 404
- Is Googlebot indexing the links located on pages blocked by robots.txt?
- Why can't Googlebot crawl this robots.txt?
Related Questions in RSPEC
- Why does Googlebot crawl for /mobile/* and /m/* pages that are not referenced anywhere?
- is there any way to detect bots (like google) with JS?
- Dynamic content for googlebot
- Ajax used for image loading causes 404 errors
- How do I stop google from crawling my Bitly Branded short domain?
- How Googlebot is finding files that don't have a any link to?
- Can we detect when google bot crawl my page ASP.Net
- Googlebot link status code returns 200 when it should be 404
- Is Googlebot indexing the links located on pages blocked by robots.txt?
- Why can't Googlebot crawl this robots.txt?
Related Questions in RSPEC2
- Why does Googlebot crawl for /mobile/* and /m/* pages that are not referenced anywhere?
- is there any way to detect bots (like google) with JS?
- Dynamic content for googlebot
- Ajax used for image loading causes 404 errors
- How do I stop google from crawling my Bitly Branded short domain?
- How Googlebot is finding files that don't have a any link to?
- Can we detect when google bot crawl my page ASP.Net
- Googlebot link status code returns 200 when it should be 404
- Is Googlebot indexing the links located on pages blocked by robots.txt?
- Why can't Googlebot crawl this robots.txt?
Related Questions in RSPEC-RAILS
- Why does Googlebot crawl for /mobile/* and /m/* pages that are not referenced anywhere?
- is there any way to detect bots (like google) with JS?
- Dynamic content for googlebot
- Ajax used for image loading causes 404 errors
- How do I stop google from crawling my Bitly Branded short domain?
- How Googlebot is finding files that don't have a any link to?
- Can we detect when google bot crawl my page ASP.Net
- Googlebot link status code returns 200 when it should be 404
- Is Googlebot indexing the links located on pages blocked by robots.txt?
- Why can't Googlebot crawl this robots.txt?
Related Questions in TESTUNIT
- Why does Googlebot crawl for /mobile/* and /m/* pages that are not referenced anywhere?
- is there any way to detect bots (like google) with JS?
- Dynamic content for googlebot
- Ajax used for image loading causes 404 errors
- How do I stop google from crawling my Bitly Branded short domain?
- How Googlebot is finding files that don't have a any link to?
- Can we detect when google bot crawl my page ASP.Net
- Googlebot link status code returns 200 when it should be 404
- Is Googlebot indexing the links located on pages blocked by robots.txt?
- Why can't Googlebot crawl this robots.txt?
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
Popular # Hahtags
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
The main benefits of using the
-T
option when you set up your project is that thespec_helper.rb
file will be set up automatically and your generators (if you use them) will create RSpec tests by default. There's really no disadvantage to setting things up later as long as you know how to set up RSpec.As far as leaving open the possibility of switching, I think the effort involved in either maintaining two unit test frameworks and/or rewriting your tests to fit a different framework later isn't worth it. I'm an RSpec guy, but when I take over a project that uses TestUnit or Minitest, I just power on through and keep working with what's already there. As soon as you get to a point where you have to have to run two sets of unit tests (not to mention acceptance/functional/integration tests if you're using something like Cucumber), you're increasing the time and effort required to run your tests, which makes it less likely they will get run as often as they should be.