In the method below, we set volatile int success = 0 and then enter a
while(!success) loop.
The loop increments tries, then enters a transaction, from within which we make a call to java sun.misc.Unsafe.putLong and we keep looping until the transaction succeeds.
so long as the debug flag __TRX_DEBUG__ is set, it will print the number of tries before returning.
Since that number is consistently zero, I have since added some "Hello" printfs.
The output of the program is
Hello0?!
putLong: (Lsun/misc/Unsafe;Ljava/lang/Class;Ljava/lang/Object;JJ)V with 0 tries
And I quite simply don't understand why.
/*
* Class: jnirtm_Transactionally
* Method: putLong
* Signature: (Lsun/misc/Unsafe;Ljava/lang/Class;Ljava/lang/Object;JJ)V
*/
jmethodID midPutLong = NULL;
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ(
JNIEnv *env,
jclass _obsolete,
jobject unsafe,
jclass unsafe_class,
jobject base,
jlong off,
jlong value
){
if(midPutLong == NULL){
midPutLong = (*env)->GetMethodID(env,unsafe_class,"putLong","(Ljava/lang/Object;JJ)V");
#ifdef __TRX_ASSERT__
assert(midPutLong != NULL);
#endif
}
volatile int tries = 0;
volatile int success = 0;
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
printf("Hello0?!\n");
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"incl %0\n"
"xbegin 1f" /*1f: local label 1, look forward to find first*/
:"+rm"(tries)
:"rm"(success)/*artificial dependency to prevent re-ordering*/
);
/*do we need more artificial dependencies, here, to avoid re-ordering?*/
//unsafe.putInt(base,off,value);
printf("Hello1?!\n");
(*env)-> CallVoidMethod(env,unsafe,midPutLong,base,off,value);
printf("Hello2?!\n");
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"xend\n\t"
"incl %0\n" /*increment success ==> break out of loop*/
"jmp 2f\n" /*jump to end of loop*/
"1:\n" /*local label 1 (jumped to when transaction is aborted)*/
"2:" /*local label 2 (jumped to after a successfully completed transaction)*/
:"+rm"(success)
:"rm"(tries) /*artificial dependency*/
);
}
#ifdef __TRX_DEBUG__
printf("putLong: (Lsun/misc/Unsafe;Ljava/lang/Class;Ljava/lang/Object;JJ)V with %d tries\n",tries);
#endif
}
The interesting thing is that further up the file, I have a different method,
/*
* Class: jnirtm_Transactionally
* Method: putLong
* Signature: (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;J)V
*/
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J(JNIEnv* env, jclass _obsolete, jobject target, jstring fieldname, jlong value){
jclass targetClass = (*env)->GetObjectClass(env,target);
const char *str_fname = (*env)->GetStringUTFChars(env,fieldname,NULL);
jfieldID fidFLD = (*env)->GetFieldID(env, targetClass, str_fname, "J");
volatile int tries = 0;
volatile int success = 0;
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"incl %0\n"
"xbegin 1f" /*1f: local label 1, look forward to find first*/
:"+rm"(tries)
:"rm"(success)/*artificial dependency to prevent re-ordering*/
);
/*do we need more artificial dependencies, here, to avoid re-ordering?*/
(*env)->SetLongField(env,targetClass,fidFLD,value);
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"xend\n\t"
"incl %0\n" /*increment success ==> break out of loop*/
"jmp 2f\n" /*jump to end of loop*/
"1:\n" /*local label 1 (jumped to when transaction is aborted)*/
"2:" /*local label 2 (jumped to after a successfully completed transaction)*/
:"+rm"(success)
:"rm"(tries) /*artificial dependency*/
);
}
#ifdef __TRX_DEBUG__
printf("putLong: (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;J)V with %d tries\n",tries);
#endif
}
which does essentially the same (except it's using a different method to change the data), but which consistently outputs
putLong: (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;J)V with 1 tries
Each method gets called exactly once per run (from Java):
//requires base class acquisition and field index lookup
Transactionally.putLong(base$x, "x",3L);
assert(data.x == 3);
//requires callback to java which then invokes intrinsics
Transactionally.putLong(Transactionally.unsafe, Transactionally.unsafe_class, base$x, off$x, 4L);
assert(data.x == 4);
and that the program is running without throwing an assertion error is just adding to my confusion.
Because if assert(data.x == 4) does no throw an error, then
(*env)-> CallVoidMethod(env,unsafe,midPutLong,base,off,value);
in the first C method must have succeeded.
Yet it succeeded without executing the increment to tries before it started the transaction, nor did it execute the two printfs I inserted around it.
UPDATE
Adding the printfs to the second method will also not print them. So I guess being in a transaction suppresses IO and the behaviour is different only for the tries counter.
Why is this happening and how do I stop it?
UPDATE
Removed the hello printfs and wasn't sure how to create the asm code directly, so I instead disassembled the resulting .so file.
Zooming in on the parts that matter,
this is from the working method:
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
867: eb 41 jmp 8aa <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0xda>
__asm__ __volatile__ (
869: 8b 45 e4 mov -0x1c(%rbp),%eax
86c: 8b 55 e0 mov -0x20(%rbp),%edx
86f: ff c2 inc %edx
871: c7 f8 30 00 00 00 xbeginq 8a7 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0xd7>
877: 89 55 e0 mov %edx,-0x20(%rbp)
:"rm"(success)/*artificial dependency to prevent re-ordering*/
);
/*do we need more artificial dependencies, here, to avoid re-ordering?*/
(*env)->SetLongField(env,targetClass,fidFLD,value);
[...]
8aa: 8b 45 e4 mov -0x1c(%rbp),%eax
8ad: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8af: 74 b8 je 869 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0x99>
And this is from the faulty method:
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
968: eb 5b jmp 9c5 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xfb>
__asm__ __volatile__ (
96a: 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax
96d: 8b 55 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%edx
970: ff c2 inc %edx
972: c7 f8 4a 00 00 00 xbeginq 9c2 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xf8>
978: 89 55 f8 mov %edx,-0x8(%rbp)
);
/*do we need more artificial dependencies, here, to avoid re-ordering?*/
//unsafe.putLong(base,off,value);
(*env)-> CallVoidMethod(env,unsafe,midPutLong,base,off,value);
[...]
9c5: 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax
9c8: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
9ca: 74 9e je 96a <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xa0>
I still don't see any relevant difference that would explain the behaviour.
Full Objdump
lib/libRTM_transact.so: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .init:
0000000000000670 <_init>:
670: 48 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%rsp
674: 48 8b 05 5d 09 20 00 mov 0x20095d(%rip),%rax # 200fd8 <__gmon_start__>
67b: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
67e: 74 02 je 682 <_init+0x12>
680: ff d0 callq *%rax
682: 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp
686: c3 retq
Disassembly of section .plt:
0000000000000690 <.plt>:
690: ff 35 72 09 20 00 pushq 0x200972(%rip) # 201008 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x8>
696: ff 25 74 09 20 00 jmpq *0x200974(%rip) # 201010 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x10>
69c: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
00000000000006a0 <printf@plt>:
6a0: ff 25 72 09 20 00 jmpq *0x200972(%rip) # 201018 <printf@GLIBC_2.2.5>
6a6: 68 00 00 00 00 pushq $0x0
6ab: e9 e0 ff ff ff jmpq 690 <.plt>
00000000000006b0 <__assert_fail@plt>:
6b0: ff 25 6a 09 20 00 jmpq *0x20096a(%rip) # 201020 <__assert_fail@GLIBC_2.2.5>
6b6: 68 01 00 00 00 pushq $0x1
6bb: e9 d0 ff ff ff jmpq 690 <.plt>
Disassembly of section .plt.got:
00000000000006c0 <.plt.got>:
6c0: ff 25 32 09 20 00 jmpq *0x200932(%rip) # 200ff8 <__cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.2.5>
6c6: 66 90 xchg %ax,%ax
Disassembly of section .text:
00000000000006d0 <deregister_tm_clones>:
6d0: 48 8d 3d 59 09 20 00 lea 0x200959(%rip),%rdi # 201030 <_edata>
6d7: 48 8d 05 59 09 20 00 lea 0x200959(%rip),%rax # 201037 <_edata+0x7>
6de: 55 push %rbp
6df: 48 29 f8 sub %rdi,%rax
6e2: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
6e5: 48 83 f8 0e cmp $0xe,%rax
6e9: 76 15 jbe 700 <deregister_tm_clones+0x30>
6eb: 48 8b 05 de 08 20 00 mov 0x2008de(%rip),%rax # 200fd0 <_ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable>
6f2: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
6f5: 74 09 je 700 <deregister_tm_clones+0x30>
6f7: 5d pop %rbp
6f8: ff e0 jmpq *%rax
6fa: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
700: 5d pop %rbp
701: c3 retq
702: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
706: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
70d: 00 00 00
0000000000000710 <register_tm_clones>:
710: 48 8d 3d 19 09 20 00 lea 0x200919(%rip),%rdi # 201030 <_edata>
717: 48 8d 35 12 09 20 00 lea 0x200912(%rip),%rsi # 201030 <_edata>
71e: 55 push %rbp
71f: 48 29 fe sub %rdi,%rsi
722: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
725: 48 c1 fe 03 sar $0x3,%rsi
729: 48 89 f0 mov %rsi,%rax
72c: 48 c1 e8 3f shr $0x3f,%rax
730: 48 01 c6 add %rax,%rsi
733: 48 d1 fe sar %rsi
736: 74 18 je 750 <register_tm_clones+0x40>
738: 48 8b 05 b1 08 20 00 mov 0x2008b1(%rip),%rax # 200ff0 <_ITM_registerTMCloneTable>
73f: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
742: 74 0c je 750 <register_tm_clones+0x40>
744: 5d pop %rbp
745: ff e0 jmpq *%rax
747: 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
74e: 00 00
750: 5d pop %rbp
751: c3 retq
752: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
756: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
75d: 00 00 00
0000000000000760 <__do_global_dtors_aux>:
760: 80 3d c9 08 20 00 00 cmpb $0x0,0x2008c9(%rip) # 201030 <_edata>
767: 75 27 jne 790 <__do_global_dtors_aux+0x30>
769: 48 83 3d 87 08 20 00 cmpq $0x0,0x200887(%rip) # 200ff8 <__cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.2.5>
770: 00
771: 55 push %rbp
772: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
775: 74 0c je 783 <__do_global_dtors_aux+0x23>
777: 48 8b 3d aa 08 20 00 mov 0x2008aa(%rip),%rdi # 201028 <__dso_handle>
77e: e8 3d ff ff ff callq 6c0 <.plt.got>
783: e8 48 ff ff ff callq 6d0 <deregister_tm_clones>
788: 5d pop %rbp
789: c6 05 a0 08 20 00 01 movb $0x1,0x2008a0(%rip) # 201030 <_edata>
790: f3 c3 repz retq
792: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
796: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
79d: 00 00 00
00000000000007a0 <frame_dummy>:
7a0: 48 8d 3d 61 06 20 00 lea 0x200661(%rip),%rdi # 200e08 <__JCR_END__>
7a7: 48 83 3f 00 cmpq $0x0,(%rdi)
7ab: 75 0b jne 7b8 <frame_dummy+0x18>
7ad: e9 5e ff ff ff jmpq 710 <register_tm_clones>
7b2: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
7b8: 48 8b 05 29 08 20 00 mov 0x200829(%rip),%rax # 200fe8 <_Jv_RegisterClasses>
7bf: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
7c2: 74 e9 je 7ad <frame_dummy+0xd>
7c4: 55 push %rbp
7c5: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
7c8: ff d0 callq *%rax
7ca: 5d pop %rbp
7cb: e9 40 ff ff ff jmpq 710 <register_tm_clones>
00000000000007d0 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J>:
/*
* Class: jnirtm_Transactionally
* Method: putLong
* Signature: (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;J)V
*/
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J(JNIEnv* env, jclass _obsolete, jobject target, jstring fieldname, jlong value){
7d0: 55 push %rbp
7d1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
7d4: 48 83 ec 50 sub $0x50,%rsp
7d8: 48 89 7d d8 mov %rdi,-0x28(%rbp)
7dc: 48 89 75 d0 mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
7e0: 48 89 55 c8 mov %rdx,-0x38(%rbp)
7e4: 48 89 4d c0 mov %rcx,-0x40(%rbp)
7e8: 4c 89 45 b8 mov %r8,-0x48(%rbp)
jclass targetClass = (*env)->GetObjectClass(env,target);
7ec: 48 8b 45 d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rax
7f0: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
7f3: 48 8b 80 f8 00 00 00 mov 0xf8(%rax),%rax
7fa: 48 8b 4d c8 mov -0x38(%rbp),%rcx
7fe: 48 8b 55 d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rdx
802: 48 89 ce mov %rcx,%rsi
805: 48 89 d7 mov %rdx,%rdi
808: ff d0 callq *%rax
80a: 48 89 45 e8 mov %rax,-0x18(%rbp)
const char *str_fname = (*env)->GetStringUTFChars(env,fieldname,NULL);
80e: 48 8b 45 d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rax
812: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
815: 48 8b 80 48 05 00 00 mov 0x548(%rax),%rax
81c: 48 8b 75 c0 mov -0x40(%rbp),%rsi
820: 48 8b 4d d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rcx
824: ba 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%edx
829: 48 89 cf mov %rcx,%rdi
82c: ff d0 callq *%rax
82e: 48 89 45 f0 mov %rax,-0x10(%rbp)
jfieldID fidFLD = (*env)->GetFieldID(env, targetClass, str_fname, "J");
832: 48 8b 45 d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rax
836: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
839: 48 8b 80 f0 02 00 00 mov 0x2f0(%rax),%rax
840: 48 8b 55 f0 mov -0x10(%rbp),%rdx
844: 48 8b 75 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rsi
848: 48 8b 7d d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rdi
84c: 48 8d 0d ad 01 00 00 lea 0x1ad(%rip),%rcx # a00 <_fini+0x18>
853: ff d0 callq *%rax
855: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp)
volatile int tries = 0;
859: c7 45 e0 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,-0x20(%rbp)
volatile int success = 0;
860: c7 45 e4 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,-0x1c(%rbp)
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
867: eb 41 jmp 8aa <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0xda>
__asm__ __volatile__ (
869: 8b 45 e4 mov -0x1c(%rbp),%eax
86c: 8b 55 e0 mov -0x20(%rbp),%edx
86f: ff c2 inc %edx
871: c7 f8 30 00 00 00 xbeginq 8a7 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0xd7>
877: 89 55 e0 mov %edx,-0x20(%rbp)
:"rm"(success)/*artificial dependency to prevent re-ordering*/
);
/*do we need more artificial dependencies, here, to avoid re-ordering?*/
(*env)->SetLongField(env,targetClass,fidFLD,value);
87a: 48 8b 45 d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rax
87e: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
881: 48 8b 80 70 03 00 00 mov 0x370(%rax),%rax
888: 48 8b 4d b8 mov -0x48(%rbp),%rcx
88c: 48 8b 55 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%rdx
890: 48 8b 75 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rsi
894: 48 8b 7d d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rdi
898: ff d0 callq *%rax
__asm__ __volatile__ (
89a: 8b 45 e0 mov -0x20(%rbp),%eax
89d: 8b 55 e4 mov -0x1c(%rbp),%edx
8a0: 0f 01 d5 xend
8a3: ff c2 inc %edx
8a5: eb 00 jmp 8a7 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0xd7>
8a7: 89 55 e4 mov %edx,-0x1c(%rbp)
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
8aa: 8b 45 e4 mov -0x1c(%rbp),%eax
8ad: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8af: 74 b8 je 869 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Ljava_lang_Object_2Ljava_lang_String_2J+0x99>
:"+rm"(success)
:"rm"(tries) /*artificial dependency*/
);
}
#ifdef __TRX_DEBUG__
printf("putLong: (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;J)V with %d tries\n",tries);
8b1: 8b 45 e0 mov -0x20(%rbp),%eax
8b4: 89 c6 mov %eax,%esi
8b6: 48 8d 3d 4b 01 00 00 lea 0x14b(%rip),%rdi # a08 <_fini+0x20>
8bd: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
8c2: e8 d9 fd ff ff callq 6a0 <printf@plt>
#endif
}
8c7: 90 nop
8c8: c9 leaveq
8c9: c3 retq
00000000000008ca <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ>:
jobject unsafe,
jclass unsafe_class,
jobject base,
jlong off,
jlong value
){
8ca: 55 push %rbp
8cb: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
8ce: 48 83 ec 40 sub $0x40,%rsp
8d2: 48 89 7d e8 mov %rdi,-0x18(%rbp)
8d6: 48 89 75 e0 mov %rsi,-0x20(%rbp)
8da: 48 89 55 d8 mov %rdx,-0x28(%rbp)
8de: 48 89 4d d0 mov %rcx,-0x30(%rbp)
8e2: 4c 89 45 c8 mov %r8,-0x38(%rbp)
8e6: 4c 89 4d c0 mov %r9,-0x40(%rbp)
if(midPutLong == NULL){
8ea: 48 8b 05 ef 06 20 00 mov 0x2006ef(%rip),%rax # 200fe0 <midPutLong@@Base-0x58>
8f1: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
8f4: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
8f7: 75 61 jne 95a <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0x90>
midPutLong = (*env)->GetMethodID(env,unsafe_class,"putLong","(Ljava/lang/Object;JJ)V");
8f9: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax
8fd: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
900: 48 8b 80 08 01 00 00 mov 0x108(%rax),%rax
907: 48 8b 75 d0 mov -0x30(%rbp),%rsi
90b: 48 8b 7d e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rdi
90f: 48 8d 0d 33 01 00 00 lea 0x133(%rip),%rcx # a49 <_fini+0x61>
916: 48 8d 15 44 01 00 00 lea 0x144(%rip),%rdx # a61 <_fini+0x79>
91d: ff d0 callq *%rax
91f: 48 89 c2 mov %rax,%rdx
922: 48 8b 05 b7 06 20 00 mov 0x2006b7(%rip),%rax # 200fe0 <midPutLong@@Base-0x58>
929: 48 89 10 mov %rdx,(%rax)
#ifdef __TRX_ASSERT__
assert(midPutLong != NULL);
92c: 48 8b 05 ad 06 20 00 mov 0x2006ad(%rip),%rax # 200fe0 <midPutLong@@Base-0x58>
933: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
936: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
939: 75 1f jne 95a <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0x90>
93b: 48 8d 0d be 01 00 00 lea 0x1be(%rip),%rcx # b00 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.3410>
942: ba 43 00 00 00 mov $0x43,%edx
947: 48 8d 35 1b 01 00 00 lea 0x11b(%rip),%rsi # a69 <_fini+0x81>
94e: 48 8d 3d 2d 01 00 00 lea 0x12d(%rip),%rdi # a82 <_fini+0x9a>
955: e8 56 fd ff ff callq 6b0 <__assert_fail@plt>
#endif
}
volatile int tries = 0;
95a: c7 45 f8 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,-0x8(%rbp)
volatile int success = 0;
961: c7 45 fc 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,-0x4(%rbp)
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
968: eb 5b jmp 9c5 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xfb>
__asm__ __volatile__ (
96a: 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax
96d: 8b 55 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%edx
970: ff c2 inc %edx
972: c7 f8 4a 00 00 00 xbeginq 9c2 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xf8>
978: 89 55 f8 mov %edx,-0x8(%rbp)
);
/*do we need more artificial dependencies, here, to avoid re-ordering?*/
//unsafe.putInt(base,off,value);
(*env)-> CallVoidMethod(env,unsafe,midPutLong,base,off,value);
97b: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax
97f: 48 8b 00 mov (%rax),%rax
982: 4c 8b 90 e8 01 00 00 mov 0x1e8(%rax),%r10
989: 48 8b 05 50 06 20 00 mov 0x200650(%rip),%rax # 200fe0 <midPutLong@@Base-0x58>
990: 48 8b 10 mov (%rax),%rdx
993: 48 8b 7d c0 mov -0x40(%rbp),%rdi
997: 48 8b 4d c8 mov -0x38(%rbp),%rcx
99b: 48 8b 75 d8 mov -0x28(%rbp),%rsi
99f: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax
9a3: 4c 8b 4d 10 mov 0x10(%rbp),%r9
9a7: 49 89 f8 mov %rdi,%r8
9aa: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
9ad: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
9b2: 41 ff d2 callq *%r10
__asm__ __volatile__ (
9b5: 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%eax
9b8: 8b 55 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%edx
9bb: 0f 01 d5 xend
9be: ff c2 inc %edx
9c0: eb 00 jmp 9c2 <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xf8>
9c2: 89 55 fc mov %edx,-0x4(%rbp)
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
9c5: 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax
9c8: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
9ca: 74 9e je 96a <Java_jnirtm_Transactionally_putLong__Lsun_misc_Unsafe_2Ljava_lang_Class_2Ljava_lang_Object_2JJ+0xa0>
:"+rm"(success)
:"rm"(tries) /*artificial dependency*/
);
}
#ifdef __TRX_DEBUG__
printf("putLong: (Lsun/misc/Unsafe;Ljava/lang/Class;Ljava/lang/Object;JJ)V with %d tries\n",tries);
9cc: 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%eax
9cf: 89 c6 mov %eax,%esi
9d1: 48 8d 3d c0 00 00 00 lea 0xc0(%rip),%rdi # a98 <_fini+0xb0>
9d8: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
9dd: e8 be fc ff ff callq 6a0 <printf@plt>
#endif
}
9e2: 90 nop
9e3: c9 leaveq
9e4: c3 retq
Disassembly of section .fini:
00000000000009e8 <_fini>:
9e8: 48 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%rsp
9ec: 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp
9f0: c3 retq
No I/O can be performed can be performed in a transaction so the
printfcalls will likely abort the transaction. Then control passes to the1:label, this is undefined behaviour as jumps betweenasmstatements are not allowed, andeaxis modified without being listed in the clobber or output lists.The target of
xbeginneeds to be in the sameasmstatement or be a C label referenced using theasmgotoextension. Or better use the intrinsics and avoid inline assembly.